Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/55311
Title: Measuring CHAOS? Evaluating the short-form Confusion, Hubbub And Order Scale
Contributor(s): Larsen, Sally A  (author)orcid ; Asbury, Kathryn (author); Coventry, William L  (author)orcid ; Hart, Sara A (author); Little, Callie  (author); Petrill, Stephen A (author)
Publication Date: 2023-06-15
Open Access: Yes
DOI: 10.1525/collabra.77837
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/55311
Abstract: 

The Confusion, Hubbub and Order Scale (CHAOS) – short form – is a survey tool intended to capture information about home environments. It is widely used in studies of child and adolescent development and psychopathology, particularly twin studies. The original long form of the scale comprised 15 items and was validated in a sample of infants in the 1980s. The short form of the scale was developed in the late 1990s and contains six items, including four from the original scale, and two new items. This short form has not been validated and is the focus of this study. We use five samples (N=10,898) from studies in Australia, the UK, and the USA, to examine the measurement properties of the CHAOS short form. We first compare alternate confirmatory factor models for each group; we next test between-group configural, metric and scalar invariance; finally, we examine predictive validity of the scale in each sample under different conditions. We find evidence that a two-factor configuration of the six items is more appropriate than the commonly used one-factor model. Second, we find measurement non-invariance across groups at the metric invariance step, with items performing differently depending on the sample. By contrast we find longitudinal measurement invariance in two of the three samples with multi-wave data collection on the CHAOS. Finally, we report inconsistent results in tests of predictive validity using family-level socioeconomic status and academic achievement as criterion variables. The results caution the continued use of the short-form CHAOS in its current form and recommend future revisions and development of the scale for use in developmental research.

Publication Type: Journal Article
Grant Details: ARC/DP120102414
ARC/DP150102441
NHMRC/1079102
Source of Publication: Collabra: Psychology, 9(1), p. 1-26
Publisher: University of California Press, Journals Division
Place of Publication: United States of America
ISSN: 2474-7394
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 520105 Psychological methodology, design and analysis
390402 Education assessment and evaluation
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: 160103 Primary education
160105 Secondary education
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Education
School of Psychology

Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
openpublished/MeasuringLarsenCoventry2023JournalArticle.pdfPublished version1.04 MBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

1
checked on Jun 8, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons