Investigation of methods for inclusion of systematic environmental effects in weaning and post-weaning weights for meat sheep in large-scale genetic evaluation

Abstract

<b>Context.</b> Genetic evaluation of Australian sheep is conducted for millions of animals for more than 100 traits. Currently, the Australian sheep genetic-analysis software (OVIS) applies a pre-adjustment of phenotype for fixed effects rather than fitting all fixed and random effects jointly in a linear mixed model to estimate breeding values. However, the current correction factors might be outdated and potential interactions among fixed effects not accounted for, which could lead to bias in estimated breeding values (EBVs). <b>Aims.</b> This study aimed to assess whether correction factors used in OVIS for early bodyweights recorded in meat sheep breeds are appropriate, so as to explore whether the pre-adjustment method is still suitable and how this compares with a linear mixed model, and to estimate the significance of interactions between fixed effects. <b>Methods.</b> Correlations between EBVs from different models and regression slopes from forward prediction were calculated, using weaning-weight data on 365 956 White Suffolk and 370 649 Poll Dorset sheep and post-weaning weight data on 292 538 White Suffolk and 303 864 Poll Dorset sheep. <b>Key results.</b> The current OVIS procedure resulted in regression slopes of progeny performance on sire EBVs (averaged over breeds) of 0.37 and 0.35 for weaning and post-weaning weights respectively. Updated pre-adjustment factors improved the regression slopes to 0.40 and 0.38 respectively. Analysis with a linear mixed model produced significantly better regression slopes than did pre-adjustment (0.47 and 0.44 respectively). Further, regression slopes obtained from the linear mixed model with flock by sex by age interaction averaged over breeds were 0.48 for weaning and 0.46 for post-weaning weight respectively, which was a moderate improvement over the current OVIS model. Including a flock by sex by age interaction produced significantly better improvement in Poll Dorset sheep and modest improvement in White Suffolk sheep than did linear mixed model without interaction. <b>Conclusions.</b> Using a linear mixed model with a flock by sex by age interaction significantly improves the utility of estimated breeding values for weaning and post-weaning weight in predicting the performance of future progeny. <b>Implications.</b> To account for systematic environmental effects, a linear mixed model should be used in OVIS to jointly estimate the fixed effects and EBVs.