Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/28819
Title: Comparing the toepads of Australian diurnal and nocturnal raptors with nonpredatory taxa: Insights into functional morphology
Contributor(s): Tsang, Leah R (author); Wilson, Laura A B (author); McDonald, Paul G  (author)orcid 
Publication Date: 2019-11
Early Online Version: 2019-08-23
DOI: 10.1002/jmor.21057
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/28819
Abstract: The ventral structures of the avian digits are the critical interface between a bird and the item within its grasp (e.g., prey, landing substrate, or object), and as such are vital for ensuring the hunting success and survival of predatory birds. Here, we present the first descriptive analysis of the ventral structures of the toes, toepad morphology, and toepad surface area of several diurnal (Accipitriformes and Falconiformes) and nocturnal species (Strigiformes) of Australian raptors. We compare these with nonpredatory taxa (passeriform and psittaciform) to elucidate possible functional explanations for these differences. Although all groups shared the structural characters of joint, phalanx, ungual, and central (tarsal) pad features, the positioning of these structures in relation to the underlying skeletal framework and subsequent gross morphology differed markedly. Toepads overlying the phalangeal joints were much more developed in raptorial species with protrusional toepads only found on goshawks (Accipiter sp.), falcons, and owls. In contrast, the ventral surface of representative passeriform and parrot species showed overall uniformity in contact surface area, with much flatter toepads. There was only a very low phylogenetic signal in the data indicating that phylogenetic relationships did not have a significant effect on toepad surface area. Linear discriminant analysis indicated that functional prey sizes correlated positively with toepad surface areas. Generalized linear modelling showed that there was a positive, significant relationship between body mass and toepad surface area, and prey category significantly affected the toepad surface areas for Digit I and Digit IV. Overall, the ventral surface of the raptorial foot is subject to considerable variation, with active hunters showing the greatest differences in structures, specifically markedly developed toepads to protrusional toepads, potentially as a means to enable more efficient predatory behaviors and facilitate diet preferences for more difficult to catch prey items.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Journal of Morphology, 280(11), p. 1682-1692
Publisher: John Wiley & Sons, Inc
Place of Publication: United States of America
ISSN: 1097-4687
0362-2525
Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: 060807 Animal Structure and Function
060309 Phylogeny and Comparative Analysis
060809 Vertebrate Biology
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 310911 Animal structure and function
310410 Phylogeny and comparative analysis
310914 Vertebrate biology
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: 970106 Expanding Knowledge in the Biological Sciences
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: 280102 Expanding knowledge in the biological sciences
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Environmental and Rural Science

Files in This Item:
1 files
File SizeFormat 
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

7
checked on Sep 21, 2024

Page view(s)

1,154
checked on Jun 30, 2024

Download(s)

4
checked on Jun 30, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.