Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/28819
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTsang, Leah Ren
dc.contributor.authorWilson, Laura A Ben
dc.contributor.authorMcDonald, Paul Gen
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-29T00:57:31Z-
dc.date.available2020-05-29T00:57:31Z-
dc.date.issued2019-11-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Morphology, 280(11), p. 1682-1692en
dc.identifier.issn1097-4687en
dc.identifier.issn0362-2525en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/28819-
dc.description.abstractThe ventral structures of the avian digits are the critical interface between a bird and the item within its grasp (e.g., prey, landing substrate, or object), and as such are vital for ensuring the hunting success and survival of predatory birds. Here, we present the first descriptive analysis of the ventral structures of the toes, toepad morphology, and toepad surface area of several diurnal (Accipitriformes and Falconiformes) and nocturnal species (Strigiformes) of Australian raptors. We compare these with nonpredatory taxa (passeriform and psittaciform) to elucidate possible functional explanations for these differences. Although all groups shared the structural characters of joint, phalanx, ungual, and central (tarsal) pad features, the positioning of these structures in relation to the underlying skeletal framework and subsequent gross morphology differed markedly. Toepads overlying the phalangeal joints were much more developed in raptorial species with protrusional toepads only found on goshawks (Accipiter sp.), falcons, and owls. In contrast, the ventral surface of representative passeriform and parrot species showed overall uniformity in contact surface area, with much flatter toepads. There was only a very low phylogenetic signal in the data indicating that phylogenetic relationships did not have a significant effect on toepad surface area. Linear discriminant analysis indicated that functional prey sizes correlated positively with toepad surface areas. Generalized linear modelling showed that there was a positive, significant relationship between body mass and toepad surface area, and prey category significantly affected the toepad surface areas for Digit I and Digit IV. Overall, the ventral surface of the raptorial foot is subject to considerable variation, with active hunters showing the greatest differences in structures, specifically markedly developed toepads to protrusional toepads, potentially as a means to enable more efficient predatory behaviors and facilitate diet preferences for more difficult to catch prey items.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Incen
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Morphologyen
dc.titleComparing the toepads of Australian diurnal and nocturnal raptors with nonpredatory taxa: Insights into functional morphologyen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/jmor.21057en
dc.identifier.pmid31441539en
local.contributor.firstnameLeah Ren
local.contributor.firstnameLaura A Ben
local.contributor.firstnamePaul Gen
local.subject.for2008060807 Animal Structure and Functionen
local.subject.for2008060309 Phylogeny and Comparative Analysisen
local.subject.for2008060809 Vertebrate Biologyen
local.subject.seo2008970106 Expanding Knowledge in the Biological Sciencesen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.emailpmcdon21@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.publisher.placeUnited States of Americaen
local.format.startpage1682en
local.format.endpage1692en
local.identifier.scopusid85071009447en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume280en
local.identifier.issue11en
local.title.subtitleInsights into functional morphologyen
local.contributor.lastnameTsangen
local.contributor.lastnameWilsonen
local.contributor.lastnameMcDonalden
dc.identifier.staffune-id:pmcdon21en
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-9541-3304en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:1959.11/28819en
local.date.onlineversion2019-08-23-
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleComparing the toepads of Australian diurnal and nocturnal raptors with nonpredatory taxaen
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorTsang, Leah Ren
local.search.authorWilson, Laura A Ben
local.search.authorMcDonald, Paul Gen
local.uneassociationYesen
local.atsiresearchNoen
local.sensitive.culturalNoen
local.identifier.wosid000483285800001en
local.year.available2019en
local.year.published2019en
local.fileurl.closedpublishedhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/1dbc8d95-4dc3-4453-a30e-69d5d7f58188en
local.subject.for2020310911 Animal structure and functionen
local.subject.for2020310410 Phylogeny and comparative analysisen
local.subject.for2020310914 Vertebrate biologyen
local.subject.seo2020280102 Expanding knowledge in the biological sciencesen
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Environmental and Rural Science
Files in This Item:
1 files
File SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

7
checked on Nov 2, 2024

Page view(s)

1,154
checked on Jun 30, 2024

Download(s)

4
checked on Jun 30, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.