Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/17210
Title: | Modelling the influences of evaluation on school principals: Towards evaluation capacity building | Contributor(s): | Ikin, Kerrie Beryl (author); McClenaghan, Peter (author) | Publication Date: | 2015 | Handle Link: | https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/17210 | Abstract: | School reviews form part of many school systems' evaluation frameworks, most often with the dual purpose of accountability and improvement. With some modifications, such reviews also have potential as evaluation-capacity-building activities. This article demonstrates how to create evaluation capacity building by combining formative and summative evaluation in school reviews that can deliver both accountability and school improvement. Using a traditional school-review structure as a starting-point, a new school-review strategy was developed that engaged school principals as evaluators in ways that boosted evaluation capacity in their institutions. Two groups of principals were studied. From the case study that ensued it was found that principals who advised only as team members in other principals' schools primarily engaged in single-loop learning. On the other hand, principals in the second group had to understand and apply criteria in the evaluation of their own schools, design evaluation strategies and techniques, and later reflect critically on the quality of evaluation practices and capacities in order to improve the values and assumptions influencing their own practices. This group demonstrated engagement in an integrated and experiential learning cycle of experiencing, reflecting, thinking and acting, and hence double-loop learning. In other words, the enhanced capacity of this latter group of principals included new skills, knowledge and understandings that became embedded in the culture and practices of their schools. This article breaks new ground by establishing the limitations of a composite model of evaluation influence derived from current literature. Further, it uses empirical data from field trials to propose a new model that emphasises the role of catalytic values and double-loop learning in situations where leaders become transformational and formative evaluators in empowered communities of practice. | Publication Type: | Journal Article | Source of Publication: | Evaluation Journal of Australasia, 15(1), p. 19-27 | Publisher: | Australasian Evaluation Society (AES) | Place of Publication: | Australia | ISSN: | 2515-9372 1035-719X |
Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: | 150310 Organisation and Management Theory 150311 Organisational Behaviour 150305 Human Resources Management |
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: | 350709 Organisation and management theory 350710 Organisational behaviour 350503 Human resources management |
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: | 930402 School/Institution Community and Environment 930401 Management and Leadership of Schools/Institutions 930403 School/Institution Policies and Development |
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: | 169999 Other education and training not elsewhere classified 160204 Management, resources and leadership 160205 Policies and development |
Peer Reviewed: | Yes | HERDC Category Description: | C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal |
---|---|
Appears in Collections: | Journal Article UNE Business School |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format |
---|
Page view(s)
2,128
checked on Mar 7, 2023
Download(s)
4
checked on Mar 7, 2023
Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.