Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/17210
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorIkin, Kerrie Berylen
dc.contributor.authorMcClenaghan, Peteren
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-07T14:19:00Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationEvaluation Journal of Australasia, 15(1), p. 19-27en
dc.identifier.issn2515-9372en
dc.identifier.issn1035-719Xen
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/17210-
dc.description.abstractSchool reviews form part of many school systems' evaluation frameworks, most often with the dual purpose of accountability and improvement. With some modifications, such reviews also have potential as evaluation-capacity-building activities. This article demonstrates how to create evaluation capacity building by combining formative and summative evaluation in school reviews that can deliver both accountability and school improvement. Using a traditional school-review structure as a starting-point, a new school-review strategy was developed that engaged school principals as evaluators in ways that boosted evaluation capacity in their institutions. Two groups of principals were studied. From the case study that ensued it was found that principals who advised only as team members in other principals' schools primarily engaged in single-loop learning. On the other hand, principals in the second group had to understand and apply criteria in the evaluation of their own schools, design evaluation strategies and techniques, and later reflect critically on the quality of evaluation practices and capacities in order to improve the values and assumptions influencing their own practices. This group demonstrated engagement in an integrated and experiential learning cycle of experiencing, reflecting, thinking and acting, and hence double-loop learning. In other words, the enhanced capacity of this latter group of principals included new skills, knowledge and understandings that became embedded in the culture and practices of their schools. This article breaks new ground by establishing the limitations of a composite model of evaluation influence derived from current literature. Further, it uses empirical data from field trials to propose a new model that emphasises the role of catalytic values and double-loop learning in situations where leaders become transformational and formative evaluators in empowered communities of practice.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherAustralasian Evaluation Society (AES)en
dc.relation.ispartofEvaluation Journal of Australasiaen
dc.titleModelling the influences of evaluation on school principals: Towards evaluation capacity buildingen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.subject.keywordsOrganisation and Management Theoryen
dc.subject.keywordsOrganisational Behaviouren
dc.subject.keywordsHuman Resources Managementen
local.contributor.firstnameKerrie Berylen
local.contributor.firstnamePeteren
local.subject.for2008150310 Organisation and Management Theoryen
local.subject.for2008150311 Organisational Behaviouren
local.subject.for2008150305 Human Resources Managementen
local.subject.seo2008930402 School/Institution Community and Environmenten
local.subject.seo2008930401 Management and Leadership of Schools/Institutionsen
local.subject.seo2008930403 School/Institution Policies and Developmenten
local.profile.schoolUNE Business Schoolen
local.profile.emailkikin@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailpmcclena@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.identifier.epublicationsrecordune-20150309-093457en
local.publisher.placeAustraliaen
local.format.startpage19en
local.format.endpage27en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume15en
local.identifier.issue1en
local.title.subtitleTowards evaluation capacity buildingen
local.contributor.lastnameIkinen
local.contributor.lastnameMcClenaghanen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:kikinen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:pmcclenaen
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:17424en
local.identifier.handlehttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/17210en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleModelling the influences of evaluation on school principalsen
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorIkin, Kerrie Berylen
local.search.authorMcClenaghan, Peteren
local.uneassociationUnknownen
local.year.published2015en
local.subject.for2020350709 Organisation and management theoryen
local.subject.for2020350710 Organisational behaviouren
local.subject.for2020350503 Human resources managementen
local.subject.seo2020169999 Other education and training not elsewhere classifieden
local.subject.seo2020160204 Management, resources and leadershipen
local.subject.seo2020160205 Policies and developmenten
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
UNE Business School
Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

2,128
checked on Mar 7, 2023

Download(s)

4
checked on Mar 7, 2023
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.