Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/58143
Title: Optimizing test procedures for estimating daily methane and carbon dioxide emissions in cattle using short-term breath measures
Contributor(s): Arthur, P F (author); Barchia, I M (author); Weber, C (author); Bird-gardiner, T  (author); Donoghue, K A (author); Herd, R M  (author)orcid ; Hegarty, R S  (author)
Publication Date: 2017-02
DOI: 10.2527/jas.2016.0700
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/58143
Abstract: 

Respiration chambers are considered the reference method for quantifying the daily CH4 production rate (MPR) and CO2 production rate (CPR) of cattle" however, they are expensive, labor intensive, cannot be used in the production environment, and can be used to assess only a limited number of animals. Alternative methods are now available, including those that provide multiple short-term measures of CH4 and CO2, such as the GreenFeed Emission Monitoring (GEM) system. This study was conducted to provide information for optimizing test procedures for estimating MPR and CPR of cattle from multiple short-term CH4 and CO2 records. Data on 495 Angus steers on a 70-d ad libitum feedlot diet with 46,657 CH4 and CO2 records and on 121 Angus heifers on a 15-d ad libitum roughage diet with 7,927 CH4 and CO2 records were used. Mean (SD) age and BW were 554 d (SD 92) and 506 kg (SD 73), respectively, for the steers and 372 d (SD 28) and 348 kg (SD 37), respectively, for the heifers. The 2 data sets were analyzed separately but using the same procedures to examine the reduction in variance as more records are added and to evaluate the level of precision with 2 vs. 3 min as the minimum GEM visit duration for a valid record. The moving averages procedure as well as the repeated measures procedure were used to calculate variances for both CH4 and CO2, starting with 5 records and progressively increasing to a maximum of 80 records. For both CH4 and CO2 and in both data sets, there was a sharp reduction in the variances obtained by both procedures as more records were added. However, there was no substantial reduction in the variance after 30 records had been added. Inclusion of records with a minimum of 2-min GEM visit duration resulted in reduction in precision relative to a minimum of 3 min, as indicated by significantly (P < 0.05) more heterogeneous variances for all cases except CH4 in steers. In addition, more records were required to achieve the same level of precision relative to data with minimum GEM visit durations of 3 min. For example, in the steers, 72% reduction in initial variance was achieved with 30 records for both CH4 and CO2 when minimum GEM visit duration was 3 min, relative to 45 records when data with a minimum visit duration of 2 min were included. It is concluded from this study that when using records of multiple short-term breath measures of CH4 or CO2 for the computation of an animal's MPR or CPR, a minimum of 30 records, each record obtained from a minimum GEM visit duration of 3 min, are required.

Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Journal of Animal Science, 95(2), p. 645-656
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Place of Publication: United State of America
ISSN: 1525-3163
0021-8812
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 300305
300303
300399
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: TBD
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Environmental and Rural Science

Files in This Item:
1 files
File SizeFormat 
Show full item record

Page view(s)

242
checked on Aug 25, 2024

Download(s)

2
checked on Aug 25, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.