Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/58143
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorArthur, P Fen
dc.contributor.authorBarchia, I Men
dc.contributor.authorWeber, Cen
dc.contributor.authorBird-gardiner, Ten
dc.contributor.authorDonoghue, K Aen
dc.contributor.authorHerd, R Men
dc.contributor.authorHegarty, R Sen
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-05T03:50:38Z-
dc.date.available2024-04-05T03:50:38Z-
dc.date.issued2017-02-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Animal Science, 95(2), p. 645-656en
dc.identifier.issn1525-3163en
dc.identifier.issn0021-8812en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/58143-
dc.description.abstract<p>Respiration chambers are considered the reference method for quantifying the daily CH<sub>4</sub> production rate (MPR) and CO<sub>2</sub> production rate (CPR) of cattle" however, they are expensive, labor intensive, cannot be used in the production environment, and can be used to assess only a limited number of animals. Alternative methods are now available, including those that provide multiple short-term measures of CH<sub>4</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub>, such as the GreenFeed Emission Monitoring (GEM) system. This study was conducted to provide information for optimizing test procedures for estimating MPR and CPR of cattle from multiple short-term CH<sub>4</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub> records. Data on 495 Angus steers on a 70-d ad libitum feedlot diet with 46,657 CH<sub>4</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub> records and on 121 Angus heifers on a 15-d ad libitum roughage diet with 7,927 CH<sub>4</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub> records were used. Mean (SD) age and BW were 554 d (SD 92) and 506 kg (SD 73), respectively, for the steers and 372 d (SD 28) and 348 kg (SD 37), respectively, for the heifers. The 2 data sets were analyzed separately but using the same procedures to examine the reduction in variance as more records are added and to evaluate the level of precision with 2 vs. 3 min as the minimum GEM visit duration for a valid record. The moving averages procedure as well as the repeated measures procedure were used to calculate variances for both CH<sub>4</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub>, starting with 5 records and progressively increasing to a maximum of 80 records. For both CH<sub>4</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub> and in both data sets, there was a sharp reduction in the variances obtained by both procedures as more records were added. However, there was no substantial reduction in the variance after 30 records had been added. Inclusion of records with a minimum of 2-min GEM visit duration resulted in reduction in precision relative to a minimum of 3 min, as indicated by significantly (<i>P</i> < 0.05) more heterogeneous variances for all cases except CH<sub>4</sub> in steers. In addition, more records were required to achieve the same level of precision relative to data with minimum GEM visit durations of 3 min. For example, in the steers, 72% reduction in initial variance was achieved with 30 records for both CH<sub>4</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub> when minimum GEM visit duration was 3 min, relative to 45 records when data with a minimum visit duration of 2 min were included. It is concluded from this study that when using records of multiple short-term breath measures of CH<sub>4</sub> or CO<sub>2</sub> for the computation of an animal's MPR or CPR, a minimum of 30 records, each record obtained from a minimum GEM visit duration of 3 min, are required.</p>en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Animal Scienceen
dc.titleOptimizing test procedures for estimating daily methane and carbon dioxide emissions in cattle using short-term breath measuresen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.2527/jas.2016.0700en
dc.subject.keywordscattleen
dc.subject.keywordsAgriculture, Dairy & Animal Scienceen
dc.subject.keywordscarbon dioxideen
dc.subject.keywordsAgricultureen
dc.subject.keywordsmethaneen
dc.subject.keywordsgreenhouse gasen
local.contributor.firstnameP Fen
local.contributor.firstnameI Men
local.contributor.firstnameCen
local.contributor.firstnameTen
local.contributor.firstnameK Aen
local.contributor.firstnameR Men
local.contributor.firstnameR Sen
local.profile.schoolAdministrationen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.emailtbirdgar@myune.edu.auen
local.profile.emailrherd3@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailrhegart3@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.publisher.placeUnited State of Americaen
local.format.startpage645en
local.format.endpage656en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume95en
local.identifier.issue2en
local.contributor.lastnameArthuren
local.contributor.lastnameBarchiaen
local.contributor.lastnameWeberen
local.contributor.lastnameBird-gardineren
local.contributor.lastnameDonoghueen
local.contributor.lastnameHerden
local.contributor.lastnameHegartyen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:tbirdgaren
dc.identifier.staffune-id:rherd3en
dc.identifier.staffune-id:rhegart3en
local.profile.orcid0000-0003-4689-5519en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:1959.11/58143en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleOptimizing test procedures for estimating daily methane and carbon dioxide emissions in cattle using short-term breath measuresen
local.relation.fundingsourcenoteThis work was funded by the New South Wales Department of Primary Industries, University of New England, Meat & Livestock Australia, the Australian Department of Agriculture, and Angus Society of Australia.en
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorArthur, P Fen
local.search.authorBarchia, I Men
local.search.authorWeber, Cen
local.search.authorBird-gardiner, Ten
local.search.authorDonoghue, K Aen
local.search.authorHerd, R Men
local.search.authorHegarty, R Sen
local.uneassociationYesen
local.atsiresearchNoen
local.sensitive.culturalNoen
local.year.published2017en
local.fileurl.closedpublishedhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/5726a04b-39d1-4949-995f-3396d2db99e3en
local.subject.for2020300305en
local.subject.for2020300303en
local.subject.for2020300399en
local.subject.seo2020TBDen
local.codeupdate.date2024-07-02T13:47:09.857en
local.codeupdate.epersonrherd3@une.edu.auen
local.codeupdate.finalisedtrueen
local.original.for20203003 Animal productionen
local.original.seo2020TBDen
local.profile.affiliationtypeExternal Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeExternal Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeExternal Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeExternal Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeExternal Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeExternal Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeUNE Affiliationen
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Environmental and Rural Science
Files in This Item:
1 files
File SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

242
checked on Aug 25, 2024

Download(s)

2
checked on Aug 25, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.