Title: | Predicting phenotypes of beef eating quality traits |
Contributor(s): | Forutan, Mehrnush (author); Lynn, Andrew (author); Aliloo, Hassan (author) ; Clark, Samuel A (author) ; McGilchrist, Peter (author) ; Polkinghorne, Rod (author); Hayes, Ben J (author) |
Publication Date: | 2023-02-01 |
Open Access: | Yes |
DOI: | 10.3389/fgene.2023.1089490 |
Handle Link: | https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/55408 |
Abstract: | | Introduction: Phenotype predictions of beef eating quality for individual animals could be used to allocate animals to longer and more expensive feeding regimes as they enter the feedlot if they are predicted to have higher eating quality, and to sort carcasses into consumer or market value categories. Phenotype predictions can include genetic effects (breed effects, heterosis and breeding value), predicted from genetic markers, as well as fixed effects such as days aged and carcass weight, hump height, ossification, and hormone growth promotant (HGP) status.
Methods: Here we assessed accuracy of phenotype predictions for five eating quality traits (tenderness, juiciness, flavour, overall liking and MQ4) in striploins from 1701 animals from a wide variety of backgrounds, including Bos indicus and Bos taurus breeds, using genotypes and simple fixed effects including days aged and carcass weight. The genetic components were predicted based on 709k single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) using BayesR model, which assumes some markers may have a moderate to large effect. Fixed effects in the prediction included principal components of the genomic relationship matrix, to account for breed effects, heterosis, days aged and carcass weight.
Results and Discussion: A model which allowed breed effects to be captured in the SNP effects (e.g., not explicitly fitting these effects) tended to have slightly higher accuracies (0.43-0.50) compared to when these effects were explicitly fitted as fixed effects (0.42-0.49), perhaps because breed effects when explicitly fitted were estimated with more error than when incorporated into the (random) SNP effects. Adding estimates of effects of days aged and carcass weight did not increase the accuracy of phenotype predictions in this particular analysis. The accuracy of phenotype prediction for beef eating quality traits was sufficiently high that such predictions could be useful in predicting eating quality from DNA samples taken from an animal/carcass as it enters the processing plant, to enable optimal supply chain value extraction by sorting product into markets with different quality. The BayesR predictions identified several novel genes potentially associated with beef eating quality.
Publication Type: | Journal Article |
Source of Publication: | Frontiers in Genetics, v.14, p. 1-6 |
Publisher: | Frontiers Research Foundation |
Place of Publication: | Switzerland |
ISSN: | 1664-8021 |
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: | 300305 Animal reproduction and breeding 300302 Animal management 310509 Genomics |
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: | 100401 Beef cattle 100199 Environmentally sustainable animal production not elsewhere classified 241303 Carcass meat (incl. fish and seafood) |
Peer Reviewed: | Yes |
HERDC Category Description: | C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal |
Appears in Collections: | Journal Article School of Environmental and Rural Science
|