Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/52090
Title: Integrating ecosystem services into conservation strategies for freshwater and marine habitats: a review
Contributor(s): Boulton, Andrew J  (author); Ekebom, Jan (author); Gíslason, Gísli Már (author)
Publication Date: 2016-09
Early Online Version: 2016-09-04
Open Access: Yes
DOI: 10.1002/aqc.2703Open Access Link
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/52090
Abstract: 
  1. Over the last two decades, there has been increasing public and political recognition of society's dependency upon natural habitat complexity and ecological processes to sustain provision of crucial ecosystem services, ranging from supplying potable water through to climate regulation. How has the ecosystem-services perspective been integrated into strategies for aquatic habitat conservation?
  2. Literature on conservation of diverse freshwater and marine habitats was reviewed to assess the extent to which past and current strategies specifically targeted ecosystem services, and considered ecosystem functions, potential trade-offs and social issues when formulating protection measures for conserving aquatic habitats.
  3. Surprisingly few published examples exist where comprehensive assessment of ecosystem services supported development of conservation plans. Seldom were aquatic habitat conservation objectives framed in terms of balancing trade-offs, assessing social values and evaluating suites of ecosystem services under different strategies. Time frames for achieving these objectives were also rarely specified. There was no evidence for fundamental differences between marine and freshwater habitats with respect to their ecosystem services that should be considered when setting targets for their conservation.
  4. When an ecosystem-service perspective is used for setting objectives in aquatic habitat conservation, the following actions are recommended: (1) explicitly listing and evaluating full suites of ecosystem services to be conserved; (2) identifying current and future potential trade-offs arising from conservation; (3) specifying time frames within which particular strategies might protect or enhance desired services; and (4) predicting how different proposed strategies might affect each ecosystem function, service flow and public benefit.
  5. This approach will help ensure that less-apparent ecosystem services (e.g. regulating, supporting) and their associated ecosystem functions receive adequate recognition and protection in aquatic conservation of freshwater and marine habitats. However, conservation objectives should not focus solely on protecting or enhancing ecosystem services but complement current strategies targeting biodiversity and other conservation goals.
Publication Type: Review
Source of Publication: Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, v.26 (5)
Publisher: John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Place of Publication: United Kingdom
ISSN: 1099-0755
1052-7613
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 410204 Ecosystem services (incl. pollination)
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: 280111 Expanding knowledge in the environmental sciences
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: D1 A Substantial Review of an Entire Field of Study
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Environmental and Rural Science

Files in This Item:
1 files
File SizeFormat 
closedpublished/IntegratingBoulton2016JournalArticle.pdf778.85 kBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

63
checked on Dec 21, 2024

Page view(s)

1,334
checked on Dec 22, 2024

Download(s)

90
checked on Dec 22, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.