Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/52090
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBoulton, Andrew Jen
dc.contributor.authorEkebom, Janen
dc.contributor.authorGíslason, Gísli Máren
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-11T05:25:00Z-
dc.date.available2022-05-11T05:25:00Z-
dc.date.issued2016-09-
dc.identifier.citationAquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, v.26 (5)en
dc.identifier.issn1099-0755en
dc.identifier.issn1052-7613en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/52090-
dc.description.abstract<ol><li>Over the last two decades, there has been increasing public and political recognition of society's dependency upon natural habitat complexity and ecological processes to sustain provision of crucial ecosystem services, ranging from supplying potable water through to climate regulation. How has the ecosystem-services perspective been integrated into strategies for aquatic habitat conservation?</li><li>Literature on conservation of diverse freshwater and marine habitats was reviewed to assess the extent to which past and current strategies specifically targeted ecosystem services, and considered ecosystem functions, potential trade-offs and social issues when formulating protection measures for conserving aquatic habitats.</li><li>Surprisingly few published examples exist where comprehensive assessment of ecosystem services supported development of conservation plans. Seldom were aquatic habitat conservation objectives framed in terms of balancing trade-offs, assessing social values and evaluating suites of ecosystem services under different strategies. Time frames for achieving these objectives were also rarely specified. There was no evidence for fundamental differences between marine and freshwater habitats with respect to their ecosystem services that should be considered when setting targets for their conservation.</li><li>When an ecosystem-service perspective is used for setting objectives in aquatic habitat conservation, the following actions are recommended: (1) explicitly listing and evaluating full suites of ecosystem services to be conserved; (2) identifying current and future potential trade-offs arising from conservation; (3) specifying time frames within which particular strategies might protect or enhance desired services; and (4) predicting how different proposed strategies might affect each ecosystem function, service flow and public benefit.</li><li>This approach will help ensure that less-apparent ecosystem services (e.g. regulating, supporting) and their associated ecosystem functions receive adequate recognition and protection in aquatic conservation of freshwater and marine habitats. However, conservation objectives should not focus solely on protecting or enhancing ecosystem services but complement current strategies targeting biodiversity and other conservation goals.</li></ol>en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons Ltden
dc.relation.ispartofAquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystemsen
dc.titleIntegrating ecosystem services into conservation strategies for freshwater and marine habitats: a reviewen
dc.typeReviewen
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/aqc.2703en
dcterms.accessRightsBronzeen
local.contributor.firstnameAndrew Jen
local.contributor.firstnameJanen
local.contributor.firstnameGísli Máren
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.emailaboulton@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryD1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen
local.identifier.scopusid84984876986en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume26en
local.identifier.issue5en
local.title.subtitlea reviewen
local.access.fulltextYesen
local.contributor.lastnameBoultonen
local.contributor.lastnameEkebomen
local.contributor.lastnameGíslasonen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:aboultonen
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:1959.11/52090en
local.date.onlineversion2016-09-04-
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleIntegrating ecosystem services into conservation strategies for freshwater and marine habitatsen
local.output.categorydescriptionD1 A Substantial Review of an Entire Field of Studyen
local.search.authorBoulton, Andrew Jen
local.search.authorEkebom, Janen
local.search.authorGíslason, Gísli Máren
local.uneassociationYesen
local.atsiresearchNoen
local.sensitive.culturalNoen
local.identifier.wosid000388445200009en
local.year.available2016en
local.year.published2016en
local.fileurl.closedpublishedhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/7f3ca654-5551-409d-9087-781a8a55c6a3en
local.subject.for2020410204 Ecosystem services (incl. pollination)en
local.subject.seo2020280111 Expanding knowledge in the environmental sciencesen
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Environmental and Rural Science
Files in This Item:
1 files
File SizeFormat 
closedpublished/IntegratingBoulton2016JournalArticle.pdf778.85 kBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

63
checked on Dec 21, 2024

Page view(s)

1,334
checked on Dec 22, 2024

Download(s)

90
checked on Dec 22, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.