Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/28878
Title: | Taxonomic status of the Australian dingo: the case for Canis dingo Meyer, 1793 | Contributor(s): | Smith, Bradley P (author); Cairns, Kylie M (author); Adams, Justin W (author); Newsome, Thomas M (author); Fillios, Melanie (author)![]() |
Publication Date: | 2019-03-05 | Open Access: | Yes | DOI: | 10.11646/zootaxa.4564.1.6![]() |
Handle Link: | https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/28878 | Abstract: | The taxonomic status and systematic nomenclature of the Australian dingo remain contentious, resulting in decades of inconsistent applications in the scientific literature and in policy. Prompted by a recent publication calling for dingoes to be considered taxonomically as domestic dogs (Jackson et al. 2017, Zootaxa 4317, 201-224), we review the issues of the taxonomy applied to canids, and summarise the main differences between dingoes and other canids. We conclude that (1) the Australian dingo is a geographically isolated (allopatric) species from all other Canis, and is genetically, phenotypically, ecologically, and behaviourally distinct; and (2) the dingo appears largely devoid of many of the signs of domestication, including surviving largely as a wild animal in Australia for millennia. The case of defining dingo taxonomy provides a quintessential example of the disagreements between species concepts (e.g., biological, phylogenetic, ecological, morphological). Applying the biological species concept sensu stricto to the dingo as suggested by Jackson et al. (2017) and consistently across the Canidae would lead to an aggregation of all Canis populations, implying for example that dogs and wolves are the same species. Such an aggregation would have substantial implications for taxonomic clarity, biological research, and wildlife conservation. Any changes to the current nomen of the dingo (currently Canis dingo Meyer, 1793), must therefore offer a strong, evidence-based argument in favour of it being recognised as a subspecies of Canis lupus Linnaeus, 1758, or as Canis familiaris Linnaeus, 1758, and a successful application to the International Commission for Zoological Nomenclature - neither of which can be adequately supported. Although there are many species concepts, the sum of the evidence presented in this paper affirms the classification of the dingo as a distinct taxon, namely Canis dingo. | Publication Type: | Journal Article | Source of Publication: | Zootaxa, 4564(1), p. 173-197 | Publisher: | Magnolia Press | Place of Publication: | New Zealand | ISSN: | 1175-5334 1175-5326 |
Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: | 060299 Ecology not elsewhere classified 050202 Conservation and Biodiversity |
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: | 410401 Conservation and biodiversity 430101 Archaeological science |
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: | 960805 Flora, Fauna and Biodiversity at Regional or Larger Scales | Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: | 210402 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander connection to land and environment | Peer Reviewed: | Yes | HERDC Category Description: | C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal |
---|---|
Appears in Collections: | Journal Article School of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format |
---|
SCOPUSTM
Citations
63
checked on Feb 15, 2025
Page view(s)
1,324
checked on May 12, 2024
Download(s)
4
checked on May 12, 2024
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License