Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/19669
Title: Human feeding biomechanics: performance, variation, and functional constraints
Contributor(s): Ledogar, Justin  (author)orcid ; Dechow, Paul C (author); Richmond, Brian G (author); Wright, Barth W (author); Byron, Craig (author); Wroe, Stephen  (author)orcid ; Strait, David S (author); Wang, Qian (author); Gharpure, Poorva H (author); Gordon, Adam D (author); Baab, Karen L (author); Smith, Amanda L (author); Weber, Gerhard W (author); Grosse, Ian R (author); Ross, Callum F (author)
Publication Date: 2016
Open Access: Yes
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2242Open Access Link
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/19669
Abstract: The evolution of the modern human ('Homo sapiens') cranium is characterized by a reduction in the size of the feeding system, including reductions in the size of the facial skeleton, postcanine teeth, and the muscles involved in biting and chewing. The conventional view hypothesizes that gracilization of the human feeding system is related to a shift toward eating foods that were less mechanically challenging to consume and/or foods that were processed using tools before being ingested. This hypothesis predicts that human feeding systems should not be well-configured to produce forceful bites and that the cranium should be structurally weak. An alternate hypothesis, based on the observation that humans have mechanically efficient jaw adductors, states that the modern human face is adapted to generate and withstand high biting forces. We used finite element analysis (FEA) to test two opposing mechanical hypotheses: That compared to our closest living relative, chimpanzees ('Pan troglodytes'), the modern human craniofacial skeleton is (1) less well configured, or (2) better configured to generate and withstand high magnitude bite forces. We considered intraspecific variation in our examination of human feeding biomechanics by examining a sample of geographically diverse crania that differed notably in shape.We found that our biomechanical models of human crania had broadly similar mechanical behavior despite their shape variation and were, on average, less structurally stiff than the crania of chimpanzees during unilateral biting when loaded with physiologically-scaled muscle loads. Our results also show that modern humans are efficient producers of bite force, consistent with previous analyses. However, highly tensile reaction forces were generated at the working (biting) side jaw joint during unilateral molar bites in which the chewing muscles were recruited with bilateral symmetry. In life, such a configuration would have increased the risk of joint dislocation and constrained the maximum recruitment levels of the masticatory muscles on the balancing (non-biting) side of the head. Our results do not necessarily conflict with the hypothesis that anterior tooth (incisors, canines, premolars) biting could have been selectively important in humans, although the reduced size of the premolars in humans has been shown to increase the risk of tooth crown fracture. We interpret our results to suggest that human craniofacial evolution was probably not driven by selection for high magnitude unilateral biting, and that increased masticatory muscle efficiency in humans is likely to be a secondary byproduct of selection for some function unrelated to forceful biting behaviors. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that a shift to softer foods and/or the innovation of pre-oral food processing techniques relaxed selective pressures maintaining craniofacial features that favor forceful biting and chewing behaviors, leading to the characteristically small and gracile faces of modern humans.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: PeerJ, v.4, p. 1-47
Publisher: PeerJ, Ltd
Place of Publication: United Kingdom
ISSN: 2167-8359
Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: 160102 Biological (Physical) Anthropology
110601 Biomechanics
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 440103 Biological (physical) anthropology
420701 Biomechanics
310999 Zoology not elsewhere classified
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: 970111 Expanding Knowledge in the Medical and Health Sciences
970106 Expanding Knowledge in the Biological Sciences
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: 280114 Expanding knowledge in Indigenous studies
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Appears in Collections:Journal Article

Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

42
checked on Aug 17, 2024

Page view(s)

1,470
checked on May 12, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.