Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/63894
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKanyama, Christopher Manchishien
dc.contributor.authorNgosa, Mathewsen
dc.contributor.authorSibanda, Terence Zen
dc.contributor.authorMoss, Amy Fen
dc.contributor.authorCrowley, Tamsyn Men
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-16T08:06:24Z-
dc.date.available2024-11-16T08:06:24Z-
dc.date.issued2024-12-
dc.identifier.citationPoultry, 3(4), p. 383-398en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/63894-
dc.description.abstract<p>(a) Introduction: Zambia's poultry industry comprises commercial chickens and smallscale producers of indigenous chickens (<i>Gallus domesticus</i>) (ICs). Large, integrated entities run the commercial chicken sector, while the indigenous chicken sector (IC sector) is predominantly run by small-scale farmers (SSFs). Increased costs and low access to formal markets for commercial chickens have motivated SSFs to enter the IC sector under the free-range system (FRS) and semi-intensive system (SIS). (b) Objective: This study aimed to highlight the price changes in poultry inputs and outputs and demonstrate that the IC sector has more potential to contribute to farm income than commercial chickens under family poultry production systems. (c) Method: We analysed the prices for inputs and outputs for Zambia's poultry industry for the first quarter of 2016 to 2023 using data from the Poultry Association of Zambia (PAZ). We also analysed data from the 2021 Qualtrics survey to investigate the crops grown and crops used as feed and feed ingredients, the sources of feed, and the use of minerals and vitamins by SSFs for chickens. The gross profit (GP) and benefit–cost ratio (BCR) were analysed to compare the viability and profitability of ICs and broilers under SSFs. (d) Results: Our study shows that prices for day-old chicks (DOCs) and point-of-lay (POL) pullets increased by 57–125%, broiler and layer feeds increased by 67–96%, and soybean meal (SBM) and fishmeal rose by 143–229%. Prices for live ICs, commercial broilers, and ex-layers increased by 150%, 79%, and 71%, respectively. Egg prices rose by 100–124%. Farmers tried to look for local feed sources. Over 21% of the crops grown was maize, and nearly 43% was used for feed. (e) Conclusion: Our analysis and comparison between the ICs and broilers demonstrated that SSFs could achieve more farm income by producing ICs than commercial broilers.</p>en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherMDPI AGen
dc.relation.ispartofPoultryen
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.titleRural Poultry Farming: Leveraging Higher Poultry Input Costs to Grow Zambia’s Indigenous Chicken Sectoren
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/poultry3040029en
dcterms.accessRightsUNE Greenen
local.contributor.firstnameChristopher Manchishien
local.contributor.firstnameMathewsen
local.contributor.firstnameTerence Zen
local.contributor.firstnameAmy Fen
local.contributor.firstnameTamsyn Men
local.profile.schoolAnimal Scienceen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolPoultry Hub Australiaen
local.profile.emailckanyama@myune.edu.auen
local.profile.emailamoss22@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailtcrowle5@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.publisher.placeSwitzerlanden
local.format.startpage383en
local.format.endpage398en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume3en
local.identifier.issue4en
local.title.subtitleLeveraging Higher Poultry Input Costs to Grow Zambia’s Indigenous Chicken Sectoren
local.access.fulltextYesen
local.contributor.lastnameKanyamaen
local.contributor.lastnameNgosaen
local.contributor.lastnameSibandaen
local.contributor.lastnameMossen
local.contributor.lastnameCrowleyen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:ckanyamaen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:amoss22en
dc.identifier.staffune-id:tcrowle5en
local.profile.orcid0000-0001-5330-4292en
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-8647-8448en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:1959.11/63894en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleRural Poultry Farmingen
local.relation.fundingsourcenoteThe authors would like to acknowledge the administrative and financial support from the DVCR scholarship of the University of New Englanden
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorKanyama, Christopher Manchishien
local.search.authorNgosa, Mathewsen
local.search.authorSibanda, Terence Zen
local.search.authorMoss, Amy Fen
local.search.authorCrowley, Tamsyn Men
local.open.fileurlhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/ac7dd940-8cc5-48f8-a77d-f96f9e3da14den
local.uneassociationYesen
local.atsiresearchNoen
local.sensitive.culturalNoen
local.year.published2024en
local.fileurl.openhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/ac7dd940-8cc5-48f8-a77d-f96f9e3da14den
local.fileurl.openpublishedhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/ac7dd940-8cc5-48f8-a77d-f96f9e3da14den
local.subject.for2020300208 Farm management, rural management and agribusinessen
local.subject.for2020300302en
local.subject.seo2020190101en
local.subject.seo2020100411en
local.subject.seo2020100199 Environmentally sustainable animal production not elsewhere classifieden
local.codeupdate.date2024-12-17T19:22:44.881en
local.codeupdate.epersonckanyama@myune.edu.auen
local.codeupdate.finalisedtrueen
local.original.for20203003 Animal productionen
local.profile.affiliationtypeUNE Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeExternal Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeExternal Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeUNE Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeUNE Affiliationen
local.date.moved2024-11-19en
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
PoultryHub Australia
School of Environmental and Rural Science
Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
openpublished/RuralKanyamaMossCrowley2024JournalArticle.pdfPublished Version5.1 MBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
Show simple item record
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons