Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/62213
Title: Causation and control: Understanding distracted driving in Australia through a systems thinking lens
Contributor(s): Abedi, Masoumeh (author); Read, Gemma J M (author); McLean, Scott (author); Wynne, Rachael A (author); Hulme, Adam (author); Thompson, Jason (author); McClure, Roderick  (author)orcid ; Salmon, Paul M (author)
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106435
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/62213
Abstract: 

Introduction: Distracted driving is a significant threat to road safety worldwide, contributing to fatal crashes and injuries. Current countermeasures have shown limited efficacy, necessitating a more comprehensive approach to address driver distraction. This research adopts systems thinking methods to understand the complexities of managing driver distraction in the Australian road transport system.

Aims: This research includes two studies that aimed to (1) develop a Causal Loop Diagram (CLD) to identify the interrelated variables influencing distracted driving (study 1), (2) create and validate a System Theoretic Accident Model and Process (STAMP) control structure model to identify the actors, control and feedback mechanisms involved in managing driver distraction, and (3) determine who creates and manages risk factors related to distracted driving (study 2).

Material and methods: To develop the CLD, the research team used two group modelling processes and SME workshops for validation. The STAMP control structure model was created by modifying a road safety control structure to fit the distracted driving context and its validation using a modified Delphi technique.

Results: The CLD included many variables that contribute to distracted driving, including societal pressures, access to driving technologies, distracting passengers, work-related pressures, and social media use. The STAMP control structure model identified 146 actors involved in the management of driver distraction, with 74 unique control mechanisms and 47 unique feedback mechanisms currently used for managing distracted driving. Mapping stakeholders identified in the STAMP control structure onto the CLD, identified 24 stakeholders who influence the risk factors associated with driver distraction and 29 stakeholders involved in managing them, emphasizing distinct roles between the creators and managers of these risk factors.

Conclusion: By applying systems thinking-based methods, the two studies conducted in this research project provided insights into driver distraction and its management. This research contributes to road safety efforts and provides useful insights to policymakers, researchers, and practitioners in addressing distracted driving and improving road safety.

Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Safety Science, v.173, p. 1-14
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Place of Publication: The Netherlands
ISSN: 0925-7535
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 3505 Human resources and industrial relations
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Rural Medicine

Files in This Item:
1 files
File SizeFormat 
Show full item record
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.