Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/52777
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBarati, Ahmaden
dc.contributor.authorAndrew, Rose Len
dc.contributor.authorMcDonald, Paul Gen
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-06T23:50:27Z-
dc.date.available2022-07-06T23:50:27Z-
dc.date.issued2021-06-19-
dc.identifier.citationBehavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 75(6), p. 1-11en
dc.identifier.issn1432-0762en
dc.identifier.issn0340-5443en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/52777-
dc.description.abstractIn cooperatively breeding species, the level of investment by both breeders and helpers may be influenced by the sex of offspring in broods that they attend, due to different fitness payoffs associated with investing in male versus female offspring. This might be expected if the sexes differ markedly in either the cost of their rearing, due to factors such as sexual size dimorphism, or the level of help that they may provide in later life that might benefit helpers in the future. Here we investigate how nestling sex influences the provisioning efforts provided by helpers and the subsequent growth and development of offspring in the cooperatively breeding noisy miner (<i>Manorina melanocephala</i>). In this species, helpers are predominantly philopatric males, as females disperse to other colonies to find breeding positions. We therefore predicted that helpers might invest more in helpful male-biased broods rather than those with dispersive female offspring, particularly if larger males required more resources than female offspring to successfully fledge. Male miners grew faster, fledging at the same age as their female siblings but with a heavier body mass. Male offspring therefore possibly require more resources than female offspring to raise. However, despite possible differences in the fitness returns of investing in different sexes, we were unable to detect any significant influence of brood sex ratio on the provisioning rate of pair or their helper contingent. Noisy miner helpers provision the brood irrespective of offspring sex. This could be due to an inability to recognise nestling sex, or potential future costs that might be imposed by philopatric males that subsequently compete for resources and/or mating opportunities with the helpers that reared them. From a male helper perspective, these potential costs may ultimately nullify benefits that male offspring provide in future.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherSpringeren
dc.relation.ispartofBehavioral Ecology and Sociobiologyen
dc.titleNestling sex does not influence provisioning effort of parents or helpers in a cooperative bird with a male-biased helper contingenten
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00265-021-03038-9en
local.contributor.firstnameAhmaden
local.contributor.firstnameRose Len
local.contributor.firstnamePaul Gen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.emailabarati2@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailrandre20@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailpmcdon21@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.publisher.placeGermanyen
local.identifier.runningnumber94en
local.format.startpage1en
local.format.endpage11en
local.identifier.scopusid85109216037en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume75en
local.identifier.issue6en
local.contributor.lastnameBaratien
local.contributor.lastnameAndrewen
local.contributor.lastnameMcDonalden
dc.identifier.staffune-id:abarati2en
dc.identifier.staffune-id:randre20en
dc.identifier.staffune-id:pmcdon21en
local.profile.orcid0000-0003-0099-8336en
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-9541-3304en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:1959.11/52777en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleNestling sex does not influence provisioning effort of parents or helpers in a cooperative bird with a male-biased helper contingenten
local.relation.fundingsourcenoteThe School of Environmental and Rural Sciences, UNE, provided financial support for this project. The project was also partly supported by the Ecological Society of Australia through Holsworth Wildlife Endowment Grant.en
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorBarati, Ahmaden
local.search.authorAndrew, Rose Len
local.search.authorMcDonald, Paul Gen
local.open.fileurlhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/6d19825d-5402-4699-a9c9-1fb9a35454f6en
local.uneassociationYesen
local.atsiresearchNoen
local.sensitive.culturalNoen
local.identifier.wosid000664201200007en
local.year.published2021en
local.fileurl.openhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/6d19825d-5402-4699-a9c9-1fb9a35454f6en
local.fileurl.closedpublishedhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/6d19825d-5402-4699-a9c9-1fb9a35454f6en
local.subject.for2020310901 Animal behaviouren
local.subject.for2020310405 Evolutionary ecologyen
local.subject.for2020310408 Life historiesen
local.subject.seo2020280102 Expanding knowledge in the biological sciencesen
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Environmental and Rural Science
Files in This Item:
1 files
File SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

1
checked on Mar 23, 2024

Page view(s)

1,054
checked on Feb 25, 2024

Download(s)

4
checked on Feb 25, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.