Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/52777
Title: | Nestling sex does not influence provisioning effort of parents or helpers in a cooperative bird with a male-biased helper contingent | Contributor(s): | Barati, Ahmad (author); Andrew, Rose L (author) ; McDonald, Paul G (author) | Publication Date: | 2021-06-19 | DOI: | 10.1007/s00265-021-03038-9 | Handle Link: | https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/52777 | Abstract: | In cooperatively breeding species, the level of investment by both breeders and helpers may be influenced by the sex of offspring in broods that they attend, due to different fitness payoffs associated with investing in male versus female offspring. This might be expected if the sexes differ markedly in either the cost of their rearing, due to factors such as sexual size dimorphism, or the level of help that they may provide in later life that might benefit helpers in the future. Here we investigate how nestling sex influences the provisioning efforts provided by helpers and the subsequent growth and development of offspring in the cooperatively breeding noisy miner (Manorina melanocephala). In this species, helpers are predominantly philopatric males, as females disperse to other colonies to find breeding positions. We therefore predicted that helpers might invest more in helpful male-biased broods rather than those with dispersive female offspring, particularly if larger males required more resources than female offspring to successfully fledge. Male miners grew faster, fledging at the same age as their female siblings but with a heavier body mass. Male offspring therefore possibly require more resources than female offspring to raise. However, despite possible differences in the fitness returns of investing in different sexes, we were unable to detect any significant influence of brood sex ratio on the provisioning rate of pair or their helper contingent. Noisy miner helpers provision the brood irrespective of offspring sex. This could be due to an inability to recognise nestling sex, or potential future costs that might be imposed by philopatric males that subsequently compete for resources and/or mating opportunities with the helpers that reared them. From a male helper perspective, these potential costs may ultimately nullify benefits that male offspring provide in future. | Publication Type: | Journal Article | Source of Publication: | Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 75(6), p. 1-11 | Publisher: | Springer | Place of Publication: | Germany | ISSN: | 1432-0762 0340-5443 |
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: | 310901 Animal behaviour 310405 Evolutionary ecology 310408 Life histories |
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: | 280102 Expanding knowledge in the biological sciences | Peer Reviewed: | Yes | HERDC Category Description: | C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal |
---|---|
Appears in Collections: | Journal Article School of Environmental and Rural Science |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format |
---|
SCOPUSTM
Citations
1
checked on Mar 23, 2024
Page view(s)
1,054
checked on Feb 25, 2024
Download(s)
4
checked on Feb 25, 2024
Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.