Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/4959
Title: | Why Richard Swinburne Won't 'Rot in Hell': A Defense of Tough-minded Theodicy | Contributor(s): | Forrest, Peter (author) | Publication Date: | 2009 | DOI: | 10.1007/s11841-009-0157-9 | Handle Link: | https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/4959 | Abstract: | In his recent paper in 'Sophia', 'Theodicy: The Solution to the Problem of Evil, or Part of the Problem?' Nick Trakakis endorses the position that theodicy, whether intellectually successful or not, is a morally obnoxious enterprise. My aim in this paper is to defend theodicy from this accusation. I concede that God the Creator is a moral monster by human standards and neither to be likened to a loving parent nor imitated. Nonetheless, God is morally perfect. What is abhorrent is not tough-minded theodicy but the hubris of imitating God. I further claim that it is no accident that the same sort of objection is made to act utilitarianism as to tough minded theodicy if the latter is misinterpreted as implying a guide for human action. | Publication Type: | Journal Article | Source of Publication: | Sophia | Publisher: | Springer Netherlands | Place of Publication: | Netherlands | ISSN: | 1873-930X 0038-1527 |
Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: | 220315 Philosophy of Religion | Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: | 970122 Expanding Knowledge in Philosophy and Religious Studies | Peer Reviewed: | Yes | HERDC Category Description: | C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal |
---|---|
Appears in Collections: | Journal Article |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format |
---|
SCOPUSTM
Citations
4
checked on Oct 19, 2024
Page view(s)
1,336
checked on Feb 25, 2024
Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.