Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/4959
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Forrest, Peter | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-03-10T14:38:00Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Sophia | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 1873-930X | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 0038-1527 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/4959 | - |
dc.description.abstract | In his recent paper in 'Sophia', 'Theodicy: The Solution to the Problem of Evil, or Part of the Problem?' Nick Trakakis endorses the position that theodicy, whether intellectually successful or not, is a morally obnoxious enterprise. My aim in this paper is to defend theodicy from this accusation. I concede that God the Creator is a moral monster by human standards and neither to be likened to a loving parent nor imitated. Nonetheless, God is morally perfect. What is abhorrent is not tough-minded theodicy but the hubris of imitating God. I further claim that it is no accident that the same sort of objection is made to act utilitarianism as to tough minded theodicy if the latter is misinterpreted as implying a guide for human action. | en |
dc.language | en | en |
dc.publisher | Springer Netherlands | en |
dc.relation.ispartof | Sophia | en |
dc.title | Why Richard Swinburne Won't 'Rot in Hell': A Defense of Tough-minded Theodicy | en |
dc.type | Journal Article | en |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s11841-009-0157-9 | en |
dc.subject.keywords | Philosophy of Religion | en |
local.contributor.firstname | Peter | en |
local.subject.for2008 | 220315 Philosophy of Religion | en |
local.subject.seo2008 | 970122 Expanding Knowledge in Philosophy and Religious Studies | en |
local.profile.school | School of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences | en |
local.profile.email | pforrest@une.edu.au | en |
local.output.category | C1 | en |
local.record.place | au | en |
local.record.institution | University of New England | en |
local.identifier.epublicationsrecord | une-20100121-202539 | en |
local.publisher.place | Netherlands | en |
local.identifier.scopusid | 77951877353 | en |
local.peerreviewed | Yes | en |
local.title.subtitle | A Defense of Tough-minded Theodicy | en |
local.contributor.lastname | Forrest | en |
dc.identifier.staff | une-id:pforrest | en |
local.profile.role | author | en |
local.identifier.unepublicationid | une:5076 | en |
dc.identifier.academiclevel | Academic | en |
local.title.maintitle | Why Richard Swinburne Won't 'Rot in Hell' | en |
local.output.categorydescription | C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal | en |
local.search.author | Forrest, Peter | en |
local.uneassociation | Unknown | en |
local.identifier.wosid | 000275695900004 | en |
local.year.published | 2009 | en |
Appears in Collections: | Journal Article |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format |
---|
SCOPUSTM
Citations
4
checked on Oct 19, 2024
Page view(s)
1,336
checked on Feb 25, 2024
Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.