Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/4959
Title: Why Richard Swinburne Won't 'Rot in Hell': A Defense of Tough-minded Theodicy
Contributor(s): Forrest, Peter  (author)
Publication Date: 2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11841-009-0157-9
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/4959
Abstract: In his recent paper in 'Sophia', 'Theodicy: The Solution to the Problem of Evil, or Part of the Problem?' Nick Trakakis endorses the position that theodicy, whether intellectually successful or not, is a morally obnoxious enterprise. My aim in this paper is to defend theodicy from this accusation. I concede that God the Creator is a moral monster by human standards and neither to be likened to a loving parent nor imitated. Nonetheless, God is morally perfect. What is abhorrent is not tough-minded theodicy but the hubris of imitating God. I further claim that it is no accident that the same sort of objection is made to act utilitarianism as to tough minded theodicy if the latter is misinterpreted as implying a guide for human action.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Sophia
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Place of Publication: Netherlands
ISSN: 1873-930X
0038-1527
Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: 220315 Philosophy of Religion
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: 970122 Expanding Knowledge in Philosophy and Religious Studies
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Appears in Collections:Journal Article

Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

4
checked on Oct 19, 2024

Page view(s)

1,336
checked on Feb 25, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.