Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/40889
Title: The Effects of 10%, 20%, and 30% Velocity Loss Thresholds on Kinetic, Kinematic, and Repetition Characteristics During the Barbell Back Squat
Contributor(s): Weakley, Jonathon (author); Ramirez-Lopez, Carlos (author); McLaren, Shaun (author); Dalton-Barron, Nick (author); Weaving, Dan (author); Jones, Ben  (author); Till, Kevin (author); Banyard, Harry (author)
Publication Date: 2020-02
DOI: 10.1123/ijspp.2018-1008
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/40889
Abstract: 

Purpose: Prescribing resistance training using velocity loss thresholds can enhance exercise quality by mitigating neuromuscular fatigue. As little is known regarding performance during these protocols, we aimed to assess the effects of 10%, 20%, and 30% velocity loss thresholds on kinetic, kinematic, and repetition characteristics in the free-weight back squat. Methods: Using a randomized crossover design, 16 resistance-trained men were recruited to complete 5 sets of the barbell back squat. Lifting load corresponded to a mean concentric velocity (MV) of ~0.70 m·s-1 (115 [22] kg). Repetitions were performed until a 10%, 20%, or 30% MV loss was attained. Results: Set MV and power output were substantially higher in the 10% protocol (0.66 m·s-1 and 1341 W, respectively), followed by the 20% (0.62 m·s-1 and 1246 W) and 30% protocols (0.59 m·s-1 and 1179 W). There were no substantial changes in MV (-0.01 to -0.02 m·s-1) or power output (-14 to -55 W) across the 5 sets for all protocols, and individual differences in these changes were typically trivial to small. Mean set repetitions were substantially higher in the 30% protocol (7.8), followed by the 20% (6.4) and 10% protocols (4.2). There were small to moderate reductions in repetitions across the 5 sets during all protocols (-39%, -31%, -19%, respectively), and individual differences in these changes were small to very large. Conclusions: Velocity training prescription maintains kinetic and kinematic output across multiple sets of the back squat, with repetition ranges being highly variable. Our findings, therefore, challenge traditional resistance training paradigms (repetition based) and add support to a velocity-based approach.

Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 15(2), p. 180-188
Publisher: Human Kinetics, Inc
Place of Publication: United States of America
ISSN: 1555-0273
1555-0265
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 420701 Biomechanics
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: 130602 Organised sports
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Science and Technology

Files in This Item:
1 files
File SizeFormat 
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

48
checked on Apr 27, 2024

Page view(s)

1,114
checked on Apr 21, 2024

Download(s)

4
checked on Apr 21, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.