Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/40889
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWeakley, Jonathonen
dc.contributor.authorRamirez-Lopez, Carlosen
dc.contributor.authorMcLaren, Shaunen
dc.contributor.authorDalton-Barron, Nicken
dc.contributor.authorWeaving, Danen
dc.contributor.authorJones, Benen
dc.contributor.authorTill, Kevinen
dc.contributor.authorBanyard, Harryen
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-07T23:47:06Z-
dc.date.available2022-02-07T23:47:06Z-
dc.date.issued2020-02-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 15(2), p. 180-188en
dc.identifier.issn1555-0273en
dc.identifier.issn1555-0265en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/40889-
dc.description.abstract<p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> Prescribing resistance training using velocity loss thresholds can enhance exercise quality by mitigating neuromuscular fatigue. As little is known regarding performance during these protocols, we aimed to assess the effects of 10%, 20%, and 30% velocity loss thresholds on kinetic, kinematic, and repetition characteristics in the free-weight back squat. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Using a randomized crossover design, 16 resistance-trained men were recruited to complete 5 sets of the barbell back squat. Lifting load corresponded to a mean concentric velocity (MV) of ~0.70 m·s<sup>-1</sup> (115 [22] kg). Repetitions were performed until a 10%, 20%, or 30% MV loss was attained. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Set MV and power output were substantially higher in the 10% protocol (0.66 m·s<sup>-1</sup> and 1341 W, respectively), followed by the 20% (0.62 m·s<sup>-1 </sup>and 1246 W) and 30% protocols (0.59 m·s<sup>-1</sup> and 1179 W). There were no substantial changes in MV (-0.01 to -0.02 m·s<sup>-1</sup>) or power output (-14 to -55 W) across the 5 sets for all protocols, and individual differences in these changes were typically trivial to small. Mean set repetitions were substantially higher in the 30% protocol (7.8), followed by the 20% (6.4) and 10% protocols (4.2). There were small to moderate reductions in repetitions across the 5 sets during all protocols (-39%, -31%, -19%, respectively), and individual differences in these changes were small to very large. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Velocity training prescription maintains kinetic and kinematic output across multiple sets of the back squat, with repetition ranges being highly variable. Our findings, therefore, challenge traditional resistance training paradigms (repetition based) and add support to a velocity-based approach.</p>en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherHuman Kinetics, Incen
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Sports Physiology and Performanceen
dc.titleThe Effects of 10%, 20%, and 30% Velocity Loss Thresholds on Kinetic, Kinematic, and Repetition Characteristics During the Barbell Back Squaten
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1123/ijspp.2018-1008en
dc.identifier.pmid31094251en
dc.subject.keywordsvelocity-based trainingen
dc.subject.keywordsSport Sciencesen
dc.subject.keywordsPhysiologyen
dc.subject.keywordsresistance trainingen
dc.subject.keywordspoweren
local.contributor.firstnameJonathonen
local.contributor.firstnameCarlosen
local.contributor.firstnameShaunen
local.contributor.firstnameNicken
local.contributor.firstnameDanen
local.contributor.firstnameBenen
local.contributor.firstnameKevinen
local.contributor.firstnameHarryen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Science and Technologyen
local.profile.emailbjones64@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.publisher.placeUnited States of Americaen
local.format.startpage180en
local.format.endpage188en
local.identifier.scopusid85077033331en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume15en
local.identifier.issue2en
local.contributor.lastnameWeakleyen
local.contributor.lastnameRamirez-Lopezen
local.contributor.lastnameMcLarenen
local.contributor.lastnameDalton-Barronen
local.contributor.lastnameWeavingen
local.contributor.lastnameJonesen
local.contributor.lastnameTillen
local.contributor.lastnameBanyarden
dc.identifier.staffune-id:bjones64en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:1959.11/40889en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleThe Effects of 10%, 20%, and 30% Velocity Loss Thresholds on Kinetic, Kinematic, and Repetition Characteristics During the Barbell Back Squaten
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorWeakley, Jonathonen
local.search.authorRamirez-Lopez, Carlosen
local.search.authorMcLaren, Shaunen
local.search.authorDalton-Barron, Nicken
local.search.authorWeaving, Danen
local.search.authorJones, Benen
local.search.authorTill, Kevinen
local.search.authorBanyard, Harryen
local.uneassociationYesen
local.atsiresearchNoen
local.sensitive.culturalNoen
local.identifier.wosid000540280900005en
local.year.published2020en
local.fileurl.closedpublishedhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/9b110712-5fdf-4b5b-a9c9-8761d987ba51en
local.subject.for2020420701 Biomechanicsen
local.subject.seo2020130602 Organised sportsen
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Science and Technology
Files in This Item:
1 files
File SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

50
checked on Oct 12, 2024

Page view(s)

1,120
checked on May 12, 2024

Download(s)

4
checked on May 12, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.