Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/37820
Title: Weighted Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction for Carcass Traits in Hanwoo Cattle
Contributor(s): Lopez, Bryan Irvine (author); Lee, Seung-Hwan (author); Park, Jong-Eun (author); Shin, Dong-Hyun (author); Oh, Jae-Don (author); de las Heras-Saldana, Sara  (author)orcid ; Van Der Werf, Julius  (author)orcid ; Chai, Han-Ha (author); Park, Woncheoul (author); Lim, Dajeong (author)
Publication Date: 2019-12
Early Online Version: 2019-12-06
Open Access: Yes
DOI: 10.3390/genes10121019
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/37820
Related DOI: 10.3390/genes11091013
Abstract: 

The genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) method has been widely used in routine genomic evaluation as it assumes a common variance for all single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP). However, this is unlikely in the case of traits influenced by major SNP. Hence, the present study aimed to improve the accuracy of GBLUP by using the weighted GBLUP (WGBLUP), which gives more weight to important markers for various carcass traits of Hanwoo cattle, such as backfat thickness (BFT), carcass weight (CWT), eye muscle area (EMA), and marbling score (MS). Linear and different nonlinearA SNP weighting procedures under WGBLUP were evaluated and compared with unweighted GBLUP and traditional pedigree-based methods (PBLUP). WGBLUP methods were assessed over ten iterations. Phenotypic data from 10,215 animals from different commercial herds that were slaughtered at approximately 30-month-old of age were used. All these animals were genotyped using customized Hanwoo 50K SNP chip and were divided into a training and a validation population by birth date on 1 November 2015. Genomic prediction accuracies obtained in the nonlinearA weighting methods were higher than those of the linear weighting for all traits. Moreover, unlike with linear methods, no sudden drops in the accuracy were noted after the peak was reached in nonlinearA methods. The average accuracies using PBLUP were 0.37, 0.49, 0.40, and 0.37, and 0.62, 0.74, 0.67, and 0.65 using GBLUP for BFT, CWT, EMA, and MS, respectively. Moreover, these accuracies of genomic prediction were further increased to 4.84% and 2.70% for BFT and CWT, respectively by using the nonlinearA method under the WGBLUP model. For EMA and MS, WGBLUP was as accurate as GBLUP. Our results indicate that the WGBLUP using a nonlinearA weighting method provides improved predictions for CWT and BFT, suggesting that the ability of WGBLUP over the other models by weighting selected SNPs appears to be trait-dependent.

Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Genes, 10(12), p. 1-13
Publisher: MDPI AG
Place of Publication: Switzerland
ISSN: 2073-4425
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 300305 Animal reproduction and breeding
310509 Genomics
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: 100401 Beef cattle
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Environmental and Rural Science

Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
openpublished/WeightedDeLasHerasSaldanaVanDerWerf2019JournalArticle.pdfPublished version1.94 MBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

10
checked on Apr 6, 2024

Page view(s)

1,378
checked on Feb 25, 2024

Download(s)

12
checked on Feb 25, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons