1. Research UNE
  2. UNE
  3. Journal Article
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/27033
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKoehn, Clemensen
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-30T05:42:56Z-
dc.date.available2019-05-30T05:42:56Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.citationChiron, v.40, p. 301-322en
dc.identifier.issn2510-5396en
dc.identifier.issn0069-3715en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/27033-
dc.description.abstractDie Diskussion um die rechtliche Begründung des augusteischen Prinzipats ist in den letzten Jahren intensiv geführt worden. Die geradezu kanonisch gewordene Ansicht Theodor Mommsens, Rechtsgrundlage des Prinzipats sei die tribunicia potestas und das imperium proconsulare maius des Princeps gewesen, ist inzwischen wenn nicht aufgegeben, so doch zunehmend in Frage gestellt. Mommsens Deutung stützt sich bekanntlich auf Cassius Dio, der berichtet, im Jahr 23 v.Chr. habe der Senat an Augustus als Kompensation für die Niederlegung des seit 27 v.Chr. permanent bekleideten Konsulats das Privileg verliehen, die Kompetenzen eines Volkstribunen zu haben und gegenüber den Statthaltern im gesamten Reichsgebiet ein höheres Imperium zu besitzen.en
dc.languagedeen
dc.publisherWalter de Gruyter GmbHen
dc.relation.ispartofChironen
dc.titlePompeius, Cassius und Augustus. Bemerkungen zum imperium maiusen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
local.contributor.firstnameClemensen
local.subject.for2008210306 Classical Greek and Roman Historyen
local.subject.for2008220204 History and Philosophy of Law and Justiceen
local.subject.for2008189999 Law and Legal Studies not elsewhere classifieden
local.subject.seo2008950504 Understanding Europe's Pasten
local.subject.seo2008970121 Expanding Knowledge in History and Archaeologyen
local.subject.seo2008970118 Expanding Knowledge in Law and Legal Studiesen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciencesen
local.profile.emailckoehn2@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.publisher.placeGermanyen
local.format.startpage301en
local.format.endpage322en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume40en
local.contributor.lastnameKoehnen
dc.title.translatedPompeius, Cassius and Augustus. Notes on the imperium maiusen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:ckoehn2en
local.profile.orcid0000-0003-1869-1025en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:1959.11/27033en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.abstract.englishThe paper analyses the concept of imperium maius in the late Republican and early Imperial period, essentially arguing that initially it was bound on the province where the holder of the imperium operated in person. The first case was Pompey’s command against the pirates in 67 BCE. The competences of the holder were superior to those of the magistrate being in command in the province in which Pompey was operating in person. That explains why Metellus was not obeying to his orders when refusing to cease fighting pirates on Crete. Pompey, campaigning at that time in Asia Minor, could not enforce his orders because his competences were not valid outside the province in which he was present himself. Only with Augustus’ powers in 23 BCE, this type of imperium became valid in all provinces at once without the holder of the imperium being present in person.en
local.title.maintitlePompeius, Cassius und Augustus. Bemerkungen zum imperium maiusen
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorKoehn, Clemensen
local.uneassociationUnknownen
local.year.published2010en
local.fileurl.closedpublishedhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/6ed8dea0-80d6-4591-ba84-1b7758af4a7cen
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences
Files in This Item:
1 files
File SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

1,492
checked on Jun 30, 2024

Download(s)

6
checked on Jun 30, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.