Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/22855
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Saunders, Manu | en |
dc.contributor.author | Luck, Gary W | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-04-19T16:03:00Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Conservation Biology, 30(6), p. 1363-1365 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 1523-1739 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 0888-8892 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/22855 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Ongoing debate over the ecosystem services (ES) concept highlights a range of contrasting views and misconceptions. Schröter et al. (2014) summarize seven recurring arguments against the ES concept, which broadly relate to ethical concerns, translation across the science-policy interface, and how the concept's normative aims and optimistic assumptions affect ES as a scientific approach. In particular, recent criticism has focused on how the concept is unable to address ecological complexity due to the limitations of the economic stock-flow model that ES is based on (Norgaard 2010). Acknowledging ecosystem disservices (EDS) (i.e., outcomes of ecosystem functions that negatively affect human communities) has been suggested as a way to account for this ecological complexity (McCauley 2006; Lyytimäki 2015). | en |
dc.language | en | en |
dc.publisher | Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc | en |
dc.relation.ispartof | Conservation Biology | en |
dc.title | Limitations of the ecosystem services versus disservices dichotomy | en |
dc.type | Journal Article | en |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/cobi.12740 | en |
dc.subject.keywords | Ecosystem Function | en |
dc.subject.keywords | Conservation and Biodiversity | en |
local.contributor.firstname | Manu | en |
local.contributor.firstname | Gary W | en |
local.subject.for2008 | 050102 Ecosystem Function | en |
local.subject.for2008 | 050202 Conservation and Biodiversity | en |
local.subject.seo2008 | 970105 Expanding Knowledge in the Environmental Sciences | en |
local.profile.school | School of Environmental and Rural Science | en |
local.profile.email | msaund28@une.edu.au | en |
local.output.category | C1 | en |
local.record.place | au | en |
local.record.institution | University of New England | en |
local.identifier.epublicationsrecord | une-chute-20180418-104647 | en |
local.publisher.place | United States of America | en |
local.format.startpage | 1363 | en |
local.format.endpage | 1365 | en |
local.identifier.scopusid | 84994182397 | en |
local.peerreviewed | Yes | en |
local.identifier.volume | 30 | en |
local.identifier.issue | 6 | en |
local.contributor.lastname | Saunders | en |
local.contributor.lastname | Luck | en |
dc.identifier.staff | une-id:msaund28 | en |
local.profile.orcid | 0000-0003-0645-8277 | en |
local.profile.role | author | en |
local.profile.role | author | en |
local.identifier.unepublicationid | une:23039 | en |
local.identifier.handle | https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/22855 | en |
dc.identifier.academiclevel | Academic | en |
local.title.maintitle | Limitations of the ecosystem services versus disservices dichotomy | en |
local.output.categorydescription | C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal | en |
local.relation.grantdescription | ARC/DP140100709 | en |
local.search.author | Saunders, Manu | en |
local.search.author | Luck, Gary W | en |
local.uneassociation | Unknown | en |
local.year.published | 2016 | en |
local.fileurl.closedpublished | https://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/15609fd5-51b5-44ad-9f02-3f560fb34d02 | en |
local.subject.for2020 | 410203 Ecosystem function | en |
local.subject.for2020 | 410401 Conservation and biodiversity | en |
local.subject.seo2020 | 280111 Expanding knowledge in the environmental sciences | en |
Appears in Collections: | Journal Article School of Environmental and Rural Science UNE Business School |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format |
---|
SCOPUSTM
Citations
39
checked on Sep 14, 2024
Page view(s)
2,464
checked on Feb 4, 2024
Download(s)
2
checked on Feb 4, 2024
Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.