Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/22319
Title: Improved estimation of inbreeding and kinship in pigs using optimized SNP panels
Contributor(s): Lopes, Marcos S (author); Silva, Fabyano F (author); Harlizius, Barbara (author); Duijvesteijn, Naomi  (author); Lopes, Paulo S (author); Guimaraes, Simone EF (author); Knol, Egbert F (author)
Publication Date: 2013
Open Access: Yes
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2156-14-92Open Access Link
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/22319
Abstract: Background: Traditional breeding programs consider an average pairwise kinship between sibs. Based on pedigree information, the relationship matrix is used for genetic evaluations disregarding variation due to Mendelian sampling. Therefore, inbreeding and kinship coefficients are either over or underestimated resulting in reduction of accuracy of genetic evaluations and genetic progress. Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs) can be used to estimate pairwise kinship and individual inbreeding more accurately. The aim of this study was to optimize the selection of markers and determine the required number of SNPs for estimation of kinship and inbreeding. Results: A total of 1,565 animals from three commercial pig populations were analyzed for 28,740 SNPs from the PorcineSNP60 Beadchip. Mean genomic inbreeding was higher than pedigree-based estimates in lines 2 and 3, but lower in line 1. As expected, a larger variation of genomic kinship estimates was observed for half and full sibs than for pedigree-based kinship reflecting Mendelian sampling. Genomic kinship between father-offspring pairs was lower (0.23) than the estimate based on pedigree (0.26). Bootstrap analyses using six reduced SNP panels (n = 500, 1000, 1500, 2000, 2500 and 3000) showed that 2,000 SNPs were able to reproduce the results very close to those obtained using the full set of unlinked markers (n = 7,984-10,235) with high correlations (inbreeding r > 0.82 and kinship r > 0.96) and low variation between different sets with the same number of SNPs. Conclusions: Variation of kinship between sibs due to Mendelian sampling is better captured using genomic information than the pedigree-based method. Therefore, the reduced sets of SNPs could generate more accurate kinship coefficients between sibs than the pedigree-based method. Variation of genomic kinship of father-offspring pairs is recommended as a parameter to determine accuracy of the method rather than correlation with pedigree-based estimates. Inbreeding and kinship coefficients can be estimated with high accuracy using ≥2,000 unlinked SNPs within all three commercial pig lines evaluated. However, a larger number of SNPs might be necessary in other populations or across lines.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: BMC Genetics, v.14, p. 1-11
Publisher: BioMed Central Ltd
Place of Publication: United Kingdom
ISSN: 1471-2156
Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: 070201 Animal Breeding
070202 Animal Growth and Development
070206 Animal Reproduction
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 300109 Non-genetically modified uses of biotechnology
300301 Animal growth and development
300305 Animal reproduction and breeding
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: 830308 Pigs
830399 Livestock Raising not elsewhere classified
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: 100410 Pigs
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Environmental and Rural Science

Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

33
checked on Nov 23, 2024

Page view(s)

1,186
checked on Nov 19, 2023
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.