Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/22319
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLopes, Marcos Sen
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Fabyano Fen
dc.contributor.authorHarlizius, Barbaraen
dc.contributor.authorDuijvesteijn, Naomien
dc.contributor.authorLopes, Paulo Sen
dc.contributor.authorGuimaraes, Simone EFen
dc.contributor.authorKnol, Egbert Fen
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-11T12:13:00Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.citationBMC Genetics, v.14, p. 1-11en
dc.identifier.issn1471-2156en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/22319-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Traditional breeding programs consider an average pairwise kinship between sibs. Based on pedigree information, the relationship matrix is used for genetic evaluations disregarding variation due to Mendelian sampling. Therefore, inbreeding and kinship coefficients are either over or underestimated resulting in reduction of accuracy of genetic evaluations and genetic progress. Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs) can be used to estimate pairwise kinship and individual inbreeding more accurately. The aim of this study was to optimize the selection of markers and determine the required number of SNPs for estimation of kinship and inbreeding. Results: A total of 1,565 animals from three commercial pig populations were analyzed for 28,740 SNPs from the PorcineSNP60 Beadchip. Mean genomic inbreeding was higher than pedigree-based estimates in lines 2 and 3, but lower in line 1. As expected, a larger variation of genomic kinship estimates was observed for half and full sibs than for pedigree-based kinship reflecting Mendelian sampling. Genomic kinship between father-offspring pairs was lower (0.23) than the estimate based on pedigree (0.26). Bootstrap analyses using six reduced SNP panels (n = 500, 1000, 1500, 2000, 2500 and 3000) showed that 2,000 SNPs were able to reproduce the results very close to those obtained using the full set of unlinked markers (n = 7,984-10,235) with high correlations (inbreeding r > 0.82 and kinship r > 0.96) and low variation between different sets with the same number of SNPs. Conclusions: Variation of kinship between sibs due to Mendelian sampling is better captured using genomic information than the pedigree-based method. Therefore, the reduced sets of SNPs could generate more accurate kinship coefficients between sibs than the pedigree-based method. Variation of genomic kinship of father-offspring pairs is recommended as a parameter to determine accuracy of the method rather than correlation with pedigree-based estimates. Inbreeding and kinship coefficients can be estimated with high accuracy using ≥2,000 unlinked SNPs within all three commercial pig lines evaluated. However, a larger number of SNPs might be necessary in other populations or across lines.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltden
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Geneticsen
dc.titleImproved estimation of inbreeding and kinship in pigs using optimized SNP panelsen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1471-2156-14-92en
dcterms.accessRightsGolden
dc.subject.keywordsAnimal Breedingen
dc.subject.keywordsAnimal Reproductionen
dc.subject.keywordsAnimal Growth and Developmenten
local.contributor.firstnameMarcos Sen
local.contributor.firstnameFabyano Fen
local.contributor.firstnameBarbaraen
local.contributor.firstnameNaomien
local.contributor.firstnamePaulo Sen
local.contributor.firstnameSimone EFen
local.contributor.firstnameEgbert Fen
local.subject.for2008070201 Animal Breedingen
local.subject.for2008070202 Animal Growth and Developmenten
local.subject.for2008070206 Animal Reproductionen
local.subject.seo2008830308 Pigsen
local.subject.seo2008830399 Livestock Raising not elsewhere classifieden
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.emailnduijves@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.identifier.epublicationsrecordune-20180111-10297en
local.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen
local.identifier.runningnumber92en
local.format.startpage1en
local.format.endpage11en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume14en
local.access.fulltextYesen
local.contributor.lastnameLopesen
local.contributor.lastnameSilvaen
local.contributor.lastnameHarliziusen
local.contributor.lastnameDuijvesteijnen
local.contributor.lastnameLopesen
local.contributor.lastnameGuimaraesen
local.contributor.lastnameKnolen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:nduijvesen
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:22508en
local.identifier.handlehttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/22319en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleImproved estimation of inbreeding and kinship in pigs using optimized SNP panelsen
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorLopes, Marcos Sen
local.search.authorSilva, Fabyano Fen
local.search.authorHarlizius, Barbaraen
local.search.authorDuijvesteijn, Naomien
local.search.authorLopes, Paulo Sen
local.search.authorGuimaraes, Simone EFen
local.search.authorKnol, Egbert Fen
local.uneassociationUnknownen
local.year.published2013en
local.subject.for2020300109 Non-genetically modified uses of biotechnologyen
local.subject.for2020300301 Animal growth and developmenten
local.subject.for2020300305 Animal reproduction and breedingen
local.subject.seo2020100410 Pigsen
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Environmental and Rural Science
Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

31
checked on Nov 11, 2023

Page view(s)

1,186
checked on Nov 19, 2023
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.