Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/21387
Title: Mine Lifecycle Planning and Enduring Value for Remote Communities
Contributor(s): Robertson, Stuart Andrew  (author)orcid ; Blackwell, Boyd  (supervisor)orcid ; Haslam McKenzie, Fiona (supervisor); Argent, Neil  (supervisor)orcid 
Conferred Date: 2017
Copyright Date: 2016
Open Access: Yes
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/21387
Abstract: Mine lifecycle planning is an important part of any mineral extraction operation. However, mine lifecycle planning has often not taken into account the impacts upon communities and regions that support these operations. This thesis examines whether mine lifecycle planning can generate enduring value to host communities and their hinterlands by highlighting the need for these communities to have a diversified economic base with a normalised local government structure. Using a case study approach, two remote mining communities, Leigh Creek and Roxby Downs, at different stages of their mines lifecycle, in remote outback South Australia were examined. The establishment and governance structures of the communities were reviewed along with the effect of operational planning decisions upon the mobility of the workforce. A survey and interviews with a subset of the survey respondents were undertaken. Analysis of the results highlighted the high level of dependency upon Leigh Creek by the surrounding hinterland communities, which has had the nearby mine close post the survey. In contrast, Roxby Downs, has not yet had a similar level of dependency develop upon it by its surrounding communities. The perceptions of the social aspects and infrastructure in these towns were examined, with the results indicating the social and infrastructure aspects enabled people to lead fulfilling lives, which in turn made the towns attractive places for residents. However, changes in population and a move to more mobile workforces undermined the ability of Leigh Creek to maintain its sporting and social activities; in Roxby Downs for small private service business to remain viable. The perceptions of the viability of both communities post mining were analysed. The results indicate that for both communities and their hinterlands the perception was of the towns being unviable post mining unless other industry development was able to provide employment for residents. For Leigh Creek the results also highlighted that to remain viable the town needed to become an open normalised community. These findings reinforce the concept that for a mining-based community to endure post mining, it requires a diversified economic base as well the ability of mining to deliver broader benefits through social and infrastructure benefits that are derived via open communities. The thesis concludes with recommendations to transition Leigh Creek utilising the Sustainable Livelihoods Framework to an open community now that mining has ceased. In respect to Roxby Downs for Government to aid the development of alternate industry or support the use of Roxby Downs as a host community for future mining operations.
Publication Type: Thesis Doctoral
Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: 160499 Human Geography not elsewhere classified
140219 Welfare Economics
140218 Urban and Regional Economics
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 440499 Development studies not elsewhere classified
380119 Welfare economics
380118 Urban and regional economics
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: 910202 Human Capital Issues
910205 Industry Policy
970116 Expanding Knowledge through Studies of Human Society
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: 150502 Human capital issues
280114 Expanding knowledge in Indigenous studies
Rights Statement: Copyright 2016 - Stuart Andrew Robertson
HERDC Category Description: T2 Thesis - Doctorate by Research
Appears in Collections:Thesis Doctoral
UNE Business School

Files in This Item:
11 files
File Description SizeFormat 
open/MARCXML.xmlMARCXML.xml4.71 kBUnknownView/Open
open/SOURCE03.pdfAbstract128.22 kBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
open/SOURCE04.pdfThesis4.18 MBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
1 2 Next
Show full item record

Page view(s)

3,682
checked on Nov 24, 2024

Download(s)

802
checked on Nov 24, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.