Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/15641
Title: | Improving image classification in a complex wetland ecosystem through image fusion techniques | Contributor(s): | Kumar, Lalit (author) ; Sinha, Priyakant (author); Taylor, Subhashni (author) | Publication Date: | 2014 | DOI: | 10.1117/1.JRS.8.083616 | Handle Link: | https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/15641 | Abstract: | The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of image fusion techniques on vegetation classification accuracies in a complex wetland system. Fusion of panchromatic (PAN) and multispectral (MS) Quickbird satellite imagery was undertaken using four image fusion techniques: Brovey, hue-saturation-value (HSV), principal components (PC), and Gram-Schmidt (GS) spectral sharpening. These four fusion techniques were compared in terms of their mapping accuracy to a normal MS image using maximum-likelihood classification (MLC) and support vector machine (SVM) methods. Gram-Schmidt fusion technique yielded the highest overall accuracy and kappa value with both MLC (67.5% and 0.63, respectively) and SVM methods (73.3% and 0.68, respectively). This compared favorably with the accuracies achieved using the MS image. Overall, improvements of 4.1%, 3.6%, 5.8%, 5.4%, and 7.2% in overall accuracies were obtained in case of SVM over MLC for Brovey, HSV, GS, PC, and MS images, respectively. Visual and statistical analyses of the fused images showed that the Gram-Schmidt spectral sharpening technique preserved spectral quality much better than the principal component, Brovey, and HSV fused images. Other factors, such as the growth stage of species and the presence of extensive background water in many parts of the study area, had an impact on classification accuracies. | Publication Type: | Journal Article | Source of Publication: | Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, 8(1), p. 083616-1-083616-16 | Publisher: | International Society for Optical Engineering (SPIE) | Place of Publication: | United States of America | ISSN: | 1931-3195 | Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: | 090903 Geospatial Information Systems 090905 Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 050209 Natural Resource Management |
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: | 401302 Geospatial information systems and geospatial data modelling 401304 Photogrammetry and remote sensing 410406 Natural resource management |
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: | 960802 Coastal and Estuarine Flora, Fauna and Biodiversity 960604 Environmental Management Systems 960503 Ecosystem Assessment and Management of Coastal and Estuarine Environments |
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: | 180203 Coastal or estuarine biodiversity 189999 Other environmental management not elsewhere classified 180601 Assessment and management of terrestrial ecosystems |
Peer Reviewed: | Yes | HERDC Category Description: | C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal |
---|---|
Appears in Collections: | Journal Article School of Environmental and Rural Science |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format |
---|
SCOPUSTM
Citations
32
checked on Jul 20, 2024
Page view(s)
1,720
checked on May 12, 2024
Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.