Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/15238| Title: | Did E.N. Bell Convert to the 'New Issue' in 1915? | Contributor(s): | Fudge, Thomas (author) |
Publication Date: | 2001 | Handle Link: | https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/15238 | Abstract: | Excoriated on charges of theological weakness, indecisiveness and compromise from 1915 right down to the present, E.N. Bell remains one of the controversial and contested figures within early American Pentecostalism. The point of contention was Bell's rebaptism in 1915 and alleged adherence to the 'new issue'. Trinitarian Pentecostals thought Bell had defected while Oneness Pentecostals continue to view Bell as a backslider from the truth. An analysis of the documentary evidence concludes that both perspectives were, and are, incorrect. | Publication Type: | Journal Article | Source of Publication: | Journal of Pentecostal Theology (18), p. 122-140 | Publisher: | Brill | Place of Publication: | Netherlands | ISSN: | 1745-5251 0966-7369 |
Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: | 210312 North American History 220401 Christian Studies (incl Biblical Studies and Church History) |
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: | 970122 Expanding Knowledge in Philosophy and Religious Studies 970121 Expanding Knowledge in History and Archaeology |
HERDC Category Description: | C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal |
|---|---|
| Appears in Collections: | Journal Article School of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format |
|---|
Page view(s)
1,272
checked on Mar 24, 2024
Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.