Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Did E.N. Bell Convert to the 'New Issue' in 1915?
Contributor(s): Fudge, Thomas  (author)orcid 
Publication Date: 2001
Handle Link:
Abstract: Excoriated on charges of theological weakness, indecisiveness and compromise from 1915 right down to the present, E.N. Bell remains one of the controversial and contested figures within early American Pentecostalism. The point of contention was Bell's rebaptism in 1915 and alleged adherence to the 'new issue'. Trinitarian Pentecostals thought Bell had defected while Oneness Pentecostals continue to view Bell as a backslider from the truth. An analysis of the documentary evidence concludes that both perspectives were, and are, incorrect.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Journal of Pentecostal Theology (18), p. 122-140
Publisher: Brill
Place of Publication: The Netherlands
ISSN: 0966-7369
Field of Research (FOR): 210312 North American History
220401 Christian Studies (incl Biblical Studies and Church History)
Socio-Economic Outcome Codes: 970122 Expanding Knowledge in Philosophy and Religious Studies
970121 Expanding Knowledge in History and Archaeology
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Statistics to Oct 2018: Visitors: 172
Views: 168
Downloads: 0
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences

Files in This Item:
3 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show full item record

Page view(s)

checked on May 2, 2019
Google Media

Google ScholarTM


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.