| Author(s) |
Ghosh, Eric
|
| Publication Date |
2013
|
| Abstract |
The paper discusses proposals for constitutional juries by Ghosh and Spector, and alternative frameworks in which these proposals can be placed. In defending the idea of constitutional juries, it also considers arguments made by Zurn and Rios in their arguments for democratising the constitutional amendment process.
|
| Citation |
XXVI World Congress of Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy: Human Rights, Democracy, Rule of Law and Contemporary Social Challenges in Complex Societies, p. 689-689
|
| ISBN |
9788577007257
|
| Link | |
| Language |
en
|
| Publisher |
Editora Forum
|
| Series |
World Congress of Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy
|
| Title |
A Defence of Constitutional Juries
|
| Type of document |
Conference Publication
|
| Entity Type |
Publication
|
| Name | Size | format | Description | Link |
|---|