Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/14135
Title: A Defence of Constitutional Juries
Contributor(s): Ghosh, Eric  (author)orcid 
Publication Date: 2013
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/14135
Abstract: The paper discusses proposals for constitutional juries by Ghosh and Spector, and alternative frameworks in which these proposals can be placed. In defending the idea of constitutional juries, it also considers arguments made by Zurn and Rios in their arguments for democratising the constitutional amendment process.
Publication Type: Conference Publication
Conference Details: WCPLSP 2013: XXVI World Congress of Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy, Belo Horizonte, Brazil, 21st - 26th July, 2013
Source of Publication: XXVI World Congress of Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy: Human Rights, Democracy, Rule of Law and Contemporary Social Challenges in Complex Societies, p. 689-689
Publisher: Editora Forum
Place of Publication: Belo Horizonte, Brazil
Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: 180122 Legal Theory, Jurisprudence and Legal Interpretation
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 480410 Legal theory, jurisprudence and legal interpretation
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: 940203 Political Systems
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: 230203 Political systems
HERDC Category Description: E3 Extract of Scholarly Conference Publication
Series Name: World Congress of Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy
Series Number : 26
Appears in Collections:Conference Publication

Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show full item record

Page view(s)

1,916
checked on Mar 8, 2023
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.