Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||A Defence of Constitutional Juries||Contributor(s):||Ghosh, Eric (author)||Publication Date:||2013||Handle Link:||https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/14135||Abstract:||The paper discusses proposals for constitutional juries by Ghosh and Spector, and alternative frameworks in which these proposals can be placed. In defending the idea of constitutional juries, it also considers arguments made by Zurn and Rios in their arguments for democratising the constitutional amendment process.||Publication Type:||Conference Publication||Conference Name:||WCPLSP 2013: XXVI World Congress of Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy, Belo Horizonte, Brazil, 21st - 26th July, 2013||Conference Details:||WCPLSP 2013: XXVI World Congress of Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy, Belo Horizonte, Brazil, 21st - 26th July, 2013||Source of Publication:||XXVI World Congress of Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy: Human Rights, Democracy, Rule of Law and Contemporary Social Challenges in Complex Societies, p. 689-689||Publisher:||Editora Forum||Place of Publication:||Belo Horizonte, Brazil||Field of Research (FOR):||180122 Legal Theory, Jurisprudence and Legal Interpretation||HERDC Category Description:||E3 Extract of Scholarly Conference Publication||Series Name:||World Congress of Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy||Series Number :||26||Statistics to Oct 2018:||Visitors: 233
|Appears in Collections:||Conference Publication|
Files in This Item:
checked on Feb 25, 2019
Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.