1. Research UNE
  2. UNE
  3. Conference Publication
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/14135
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGhosh, Ericen
local.source.editorEditor(s): Bruno Anunciacao Rocha, Karine Salgado, Marcelo Campos Galuppo, Monica Sette Lopes, Thiago Braga Silva dos Santos, Tomas Pissolato Alvim de Mattos Ribeiro, Vitor Amaral Medradoen
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-06T11:08:00Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.citationXXVI World Congress of Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy: Human Rights, Democracy, Rule of Law and Contemporary Social Challenges in Complex Societies, p. 689-689en
dc.identifier.isbn9788577007257en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/14135-
dc.description.abstractThe paper discusses proposals for constitutional juries by Ghosh and Spector, and alternative frameworks in which these proposals can be placed. In defending the idea of constitutional juries, it also considers arguments made by Zurn and Rios in their arguments for democratising the constitutional amendment process.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherEditora Forumen
dc.relation.ispartofXXVI World Congress of Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy: Human Rights, Democracy, Rule of Law and Contemporary Social Challenges in Complex Societiesen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorld Congress of Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophyen
dc.titleA Defence of Constitutional Juriesen
dc.typeConference Publicationen
dc.relation.conferenceWCPLSP 2013: XXVI World Congress of Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophyen
dc.subject.keywordsLegal Theory, Jurisprudence and Legal Interpretationen
local.contributor.firstnameEricen
local.subject.for2008180122 Legal Theory, Jurisprudence and Legal Interpretationen
local.subject.seo2008940203 Political Systemsen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Lawen
local.profile.emaileghosh@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryE3en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.identifier.epublicationsrecordune-20131129-170145en
local.date.conference21st - 26th July, 2013en
local.conference.placeBelo Horizonte, Brazilen
local.publisher.placeBelo Horizonte, Brazilen
local.format.startpage689en
local.format.endpage689en
local.series.number26en
local.contributor.lastnameGhoshen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:eghoshen
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-5203-4638en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:14348en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleA Defence of Constitutional Juriesen
local.output.categorydescriptionE3 Extract of Scholarly Conference Publicationen
local.conference.detailsWCPLSP 2013: XXVI World Congress of Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy, Belo Horizonte, Brazil, 21st - 26th July, 2013en
local.search.authorGhosh, Ericen
local.uneassociationUnknownen
local.year.published2013en
local.subject.for2020480410 Legal theory, jurisprudence and legal interpretationen
local.subject.seo2020230203 Political systemsen
local.date.start2013-07-21-
local.date.end2013-07-26-
Appears in Collections:Conference Publication
Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

1,916
checked on Mar 8, 2023
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.