Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/14051| Title: | The Boomerang Paradox, Part II: Policy Prescriptions for Reducing Fuel Poverty in Australia | Contributor(s): | Simshauser, Paul (author); Nelson, Timothy (author); Doan, Thao (author) | Publication Date: | 2011 | DOI: | 10.1016/j.tej.2011.01.017 | Handle Link: | https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/14051 | Abstract: | An analysis suggests that incremental GST collections from electricity accounts are more than adequate to eliminate fuel poverty. This could facilitate access to efficient electric appliances and in-home displays for fuel-poor households. The widespread shift to smart meters and time-of-use tariff structures is also required to address the source of the problem - rising peak demand. | Publication Type: | Journal Article | Source of Publication: | The Electricity Journal, 24(2), p. 63-75 | Publisher: | Elsevier Inc | Place of Publication: | United States of America | ISSN: | 1873-6874 1040-6190 |
Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: | 140205 Environment and Resource Economics 140209 Industry Economics and Industrial Organisation 140214 Public Economics- Publically Provided Goods |
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: | 910205 Industry Policy 910211 Supply and Demand 910204 Industry Costs and Structure |
Peer Reviewed: | Yes | HERDC Category Description: | C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal |
|---|---|
| Appears in Collections: | Journal Article |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format |
|---|
SCOPUSTM
Citations
27
checked on Feb 24, 2024
Page view(s)
902
checked on Mar 9, 2023
Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.