Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/9536
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWillems, Julieen
dc.date.accessioned2012-02-22T16:18:00Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.citationAustralasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(6), p. 863-880en
dc.identifier.issn1449-5554en
dc.identifier.issn1449-3098en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/9536-
dc.description.abstractWhat are the differences in learning styles between students and educators who teach and/or design their e-learning environments? Are there variations in the learning styles of students at different levels of study? How may we use this learning styles data to inform the design in e-learning environments? This paper details mixed-methods research with three cohorts teaching and learning in e-learning environments in higher education: novice undergraduate e-learners, graduate e-learners, and educators teaching in, or designing for, e-learning environments (Willems, 2010). Quantitative findings from the Index of Learning Styles (ILS) (Felder & Silverman, 1988; Felder & Soloman, 1991, 1994) reflect an alignment of the results between both the graduate e-learner and e-educator cohorts across all four domains of the ILS, suggesting homogeneity of results between these two cohorts. By contrast, there was a statistically significant difference between the results of the graduate and educator cohorts with those of the undergraduate e-learners on two domains: sensing-intuitive (p=0.015) and the global-sequential (p=0.007), suggesting divergent learning style preferences. Qualitative data was also gathered to gain insights on participants' responses to their learning style results.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherAustralasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (ASCILITE)en
dc.relation.ispartofAustralasian Journal of Educational Technologyen
dc.titleUsing learning styles data to inform e-learning design: A study comparing undergraduates, postgraduates and e-educatorsen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.subject.keywordsApplied Ethicsen
dc.subject.keywordsHigher Educationen
dc.subject.keywordsEducational Technology and Computingen
local.contributor.firstnameJulieen
local.subject.for2008130306 Educational Technology and Computingen
local.subject.for2008220199 Applied Ethics not elsewhere classifieden
local.subject.for2008130103 Higher Educationen
local.subject.seo2008939903 Equity and Access to Educationen
local.subject.seo2008930101 Learner and Learning Achievementen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Educationen
local.profile.emailjwillem4@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.identifier.epublicationsrecordune-20120222-155216en
local.publisher.placeAustraliaen
local.format.startpage863en
local.format.endpage880en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume27en
local.identifier.issue6en
local.title.subtitleA study comparing undergraduates, postgraduates and e-educatorsen
local.contributor.lastnameWillemsen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:jwillem4en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:9727en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleUsing learning styles data to inform e-learning designen
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.relation.urlhttp://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet27/willems.htmlen
local.search.authorWillems, Julieen
local.uneassociationUnknownen
local.year.published2011en
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Education
Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

1,120
checked on Jun 18, 2023
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.