Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/9448
Title: The implications of mandatory notification for clinician-researchers involved in observational research in health services
Contributor(s): Iedema, Rick (author); Piper, Donella  (author)orcid 
Publication Date: 2011
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/9448
Abstract: The 'Health Practitioner Regulation National Law Act 2009' (Part 8, Sections 140 and 141) enshrines mandatory notification in the new national registration framework. As registered health practitioners, clinician-researchers are bound by the notification requirements. This raises the question of whether mandatory notification has implications for observational research in health services that is conducted by clinician-researchers. In particular, how likely is it that these requirements will lead to reclassification of one's observations from "research data" to "notification evidence"?
Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Medical Journal of Australia, 195(1), p. 54-54
Publisher: Australasian Medical Publishing Company Pty Ltd
Place of Publication: Australia
ISSN: 1326-5377
0025-729X
Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: 111709 Health Care Administration
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: 920208 Health Policy Evaluation
HERDC Category Description: C4 Letter of Note
Publisher/associated links: http://www.mja.com.au/public/issues/195_01_040711/letters_040711_fm-4.html
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
UNE Business School

Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show full item record

Page view(s)

1,226
checked on May 26, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.