Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/9448
Title: | The implications of mandatory notification for clinician-researchers involved in observational research in health services | Contributor(s): | Iedema, Rick (author); Piper, Donella (author) | Publication Date: | 2011 | Handle Link: | https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/9448 | Abstract: | The 'Health Practitioner Regulation National Law Act 2009' (Part 8, Sections 140 and 141) enshrines mandatory notification in the new national registration framework. As registered health practitioners, clinician-researchers are bound by the notification requirements. This raises the question of whether mandatory notification has implications for observational research in health services that is conducted by clinician-researchers. In particular, how likely is it that these requirements will lead to reclassification of one's observations from "research data" to "notification evidence"? | Publication Type: | Journal Article | Source of Publication: | Medical Journal of Australia, 195(1), p. 54-54 | Publisher: | Australasian Medical Publishing Company Pty Ltd | Place of Publication: | Australia | ISSN: | 1326-5377 0025-729X |
Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: | 111709 Health Care Administration | Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: | 920208 Health Policy Evaluation | HERDC Category Description: | C4 Letter of Note | Publisher/associated links: | http://www.mja.com.au/public/issues/195_01_040711/letters_040711_fm-4.html |
---|---|
Appears in Collections: | Journal Article UNE Business School |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format |
---|
Page view(s)
1,226
checked on May 26, 2024
Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.