Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/8707
Title: In Defence of Anthropomorphic Theism
Contributor(s): Forrest, Peter  (author)
Publication Date: 2011
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/8707
Abstract: I reply to seven objections to anthropomorphic theism: (1) That anthropomorphic theism is idolatrous. In reply I rely on the concept/conception distinction. (2) That faith requires certainty. In reply I argue that full belief may be based on probable inference. (3) That the truly infinite is incomprehensible. In reply I distinguish two senses of knowing what you mean. (4) 'You Kant say that!' In reply I distinguish shallow from deep Kantianism. (5) 'Shall Old Aquinas be forgot?' In reply I discuss the simplicity of God. (6) What those garrulous mystics say about the ineffable. In reply I argue that mystics should be anthropomorphites. (7) Anti-theodicy. In reply I distinguish the community of all agents from the community of finite frail agents.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: European Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 3(1), p. 105-122
Publisher: Metropolitan University Prague
Place of Publication: Czech Republic
ISSN: 1689-8311
Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: 220315 Philosophy of Religion
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: 970122 Expanding Knowledge in Philosophy and Religious Studies
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Publisher/associated links: http://philosophy-of-religion.eu/contents.html
Appears in Collections:Journal Article

Files in This Item:
3 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show full item record
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.