Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/8707
Title: In Defence of Anthropomorphic Theism
Contributor(s): Forrest, Peter  (author)
Publication Date: 2011
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/8707
Abstract: I reply to seven objections to anthropomorphic theism: (1) That anthropomorphic theism is idolatrous. In reply I rely on the concept/conception distinction. (2) That faith requires certainty. In reply I argue that full belief may be based on probable inference. (3) That the truly infinite is incomprehensible. In reply I distinguish two senses of knowing what you mean. (4) 'You Kant say that!' In reply I distinguish shallow from deep Kantianism. (5) 'Shall Old Aquinas be forgot?' In reply I discuss the simplicity of God. (6) What those garrulous mystics say about the ineffable. In reply I argue that mystics should be anthropomorphites. (7) Anti-theodicy. In reply I distinguish the community of all agents from the community of finite frail agents.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: European Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 3(1), p. 105-122
Publisher: Metropolitan University Prague
Place of Publication: Czech Republic
ISSN: 1689-8311
Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: 220315 Philosophy of Religion
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: 970122 Expanding Knowledge in Philosophy and Religious Studies
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Publisher/associated links: http://philosophy-of-religion.eu/contents.html
Appears in Collections:Journal Article

Files in This Item:
3 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show full item record

Page view(s)

1,404
checked on Jul 21, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.