Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorEades, Dianaen
local.source.editorEditor(s): Keith Brownen
dc.identifier.citationEncyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, v.5: Gen-Int, p. 772-778en
dc.description.abstractSuccessful participation in the legal system depends to a considerable extent on the ability to manipulate language. Many people who are usually very fluent and articulate speakers feel that they are at a disadvantage in the legal process, because of such factors as the use of complicated legal terms (see Legal-Professional Language in Jury Trial), the asymmetrical power relations between legal professionals and other participants, and the often serious consequences of the legal matters in which they are involved. Yet, it is clear that some people are more vulnerable than others in the legal process, and to define this vulnerability necessarily involves a consideration of sociolinguistic issues because of the centrality of successful language use to successful outcomes in legal contexts. This article begins by looking at participants in the legal system who are vulnerable because of enduring aspects of their social identity, such as native language variety and age, and concludes by looking at those whose vulnerability is due primarily to their situated identity in the legal matter in which they are participating; for example, victim-witnesses. Although this article defines vulnerable participants in sociolinguistic terms, it is important to point out that a number of governments around the world have formally defined vulnerable witnesses as part of the process of enacting special measures to assist them in coming to court, understanding the process, and giving evidence. For example, such witnesses may be permitted to give direct evidence from a separate room via closed-circuit television. In the terms of such provisions, vulnerable witnesses are usually defined foremost as children, and the category often also includes people with mental, learning, and sometimes physical disabilities. It may also include intimidated witnesses, such as survivors of abuse. In some jurisdictions, such as the Northern Territory of Australia, the status of vulnerable witness is extended also to people who experience difficulty related to linguistic or cultural difference. The sociolinguistic view of 'vulnerable participants' used in this article corresponds to the most inclusive of the various legal definitions.en
dc.relation.ispartofEncyclopedia of Language and Linguisticsen
dc.titleInterviewing and Examining Vulnerable Witnessesen
dc.typeEntry In Reference Worken
dc.subject.keywordsLaw and Societyen
dc.subject.keywordsLanguage in Culture and Society (Sociolinguistics)en
dc.subject.keywordsAccess to Justiceen
local.subject.for2008180102 Access to Justiceen
local.subject.for2008200405 Language in Culture and Society (Sociolinguistics)en
local.subject.for2008180119 Law and Societyen
local.subject.seo2008950201 Communication Across Languages and Cultureen
local.subject.seo2008940406 Legal Processesen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Psychology and Behavioural Scienceen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen
local.identifier.volume5: Gen-Inten
local.title.maintitleInterviewing and Examining Vulnerable Witnessesen
local.output.categorydescriptionN Entry In Reference Worken
local.description.statisticsepubsVisitors: 607<br />Views: 620<br />Downloads: 0en, Dianaen
Appears in Collections:Entry In Reference Work
School of Psychology
Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

checked on Jan 12, 2019
Google Media

Google ScholarTM



Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.