Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/7237
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWalmsley, Bradley Jen
dc.contributor.authorWolcott, Matthew Leeen
dc.contributor.authorMcPhee, Malcolm Johnen
dc.date.accessioned2011-04-28T16:28:00Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Animal Science, 88(5), p. 1848-1859en
dc.identifier.issn1525-3163en
dc.identifier.issn0021-8812en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/7237-
dc.description.abstractA decision support tool for predicting subcutaneous fat depths called BeefSpecs, based on the Davis growth model (DGM), has been developed by the Cooperative Research Centre for Beef Genetic Technologies. Currently, the DGM predicts 12th-rib fat thickness (RFT, mm). To allow predictions of fat thickness at the P8 rump (P8FT, mm) site, the standard carcass fat measurement in the Australian beef industry, a relationship was developed between ultrasound RFT and P8FT in steers and heifers from temperate (Angus, Hereford, Shorthorn, and Murray Grey) and tropical (Brahman, Belmont Red, and Santa Gertrudis) breed types. Model development involved fitting various combinations of sex, breed type (BrT), BW, age, and RFT to produce 6 models. The models were challenged with data from 3 independent data sets: 1) Angus steers from 2.4 generations of divergent selection for and against residual feed intake; 2) 2 tropically adapted genotypes [Brahman and tropically adapted composites (combinations of Belmont Red, Charbray, Santa Gertrudis, Senepol, and Brahman breeds)]; and 3) a study using sires from Charolais, Limousin, Belgian Blue, and Black and Red Wagyu breeds and 3 genetic lines of Angus to create divergence in progeny in terms of genetic potential for intramuscular fat percent and retail beef yield. When challenged with data from Angus cattle, the mean biases (MB, mm) for models A to F were –1.23, –0.56, –0.56, –0.02, 0.14, and 0.04, and the root mean square errors of predictions (mm) were 1.53, 0.97, 0.97, 0.92, 0.93, and 0.91, respectively. When challenged with data from Brahman cattle, MB were 0.04, –0.22, –0.14, 0.05, –0.11, and 0.02 and root mean square errors of predictions were 1.30, 1.29, 1.27, 1.23, 1.37, and 1.29, respectively. Generally, model accuracy indicated by MB tended to be less for model E, which contained age rather than BW as a covariate. Models B and C were generally robust when challenged with data from Angus, Brahman, and Tropical Composite cattle as well as crossbred cattle with temperate sires. Model D, which did not contain age, performed the most consistently and was selected for inclusion in the DGM: P8FT, mm = –3.6 (±0.14) + 1.3 (±0.13) x sex + 0.11 (±0.13) x BrT + 0.014 (±4.8E–⁴) x BW + 0.96 (±0.01) x RFT – 0.73 (±0.08) x sex x BrT – 3.8E–³ (±4.2E–⁴) x sex x BW – 0.09 (±0.01) x sex x RFT + 1.3E–³ (±3.7E–⁴) x BrT x BW + 0.24 (±0.01) x BrT x RFT (adjusted R² = 0.86; SE = 0.013). Model D has been implemented in BeefSpecs to predict P8FT.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Animal Scienceen
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Animal Scienceen
dc.titleModeling the relationship between scanned rump and 12th-rib fat in young temperate and tropical bovines: Model development and evaluationen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.2527/jas.2009-2633en
dc.subject.keywordsAnimal Breedingen
local.contributor.firstnameBradley Jen
local.contributor.firstnameMatthew Leeen
local.contributor.firstnameMalcolm Johnen
local.subject.for2008070201 Animal Breedingen
local.subject.seo2008830301 Beef Cattleen
local.profile.schoolAnimal Genetics and Breeding Uniten
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.emailmwolcott@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailmmcphee2@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.identifier.epublicationsrecordune-20110113-144552en
local.publisher.placeUnited States of Americaen
local.format.startpage1848en
local.format.endpage1859en
local.identifier.scopusid77951120046en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume88en
local.identifier.issue5en
local.title.subtitleModel development and evaluationen
local.contributor.lastnameWalmsleyen
local.contributor.lastnameWolcotten
local.contributor.lastnameMcPheeen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:bwalmsleen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:mwolcotten
dc.identifier.staffune-id:mmcphee2en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:7403en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleModeling the relationship between scanned rump and 12th-rib fat in young temperate and tropical bovinesen
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorWalmsley, Bradley Jen
local.search.authorWolcott, Matthew Leeen
local.search.authorMcPhee, Malcolm Johnen
local.uneassociationUnknownen
local.identifier.wosid000276689000029en
local.year.published2010en
Appears in Collections:Animal Genetics and Breeding Unit (AGBU)
Journal Article
Files in This Item:
3 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

6
checked on Nov 25, 2023

Page view(s)

1,600
checked on Sep 24, 2023
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.