Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/6833
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWright, Philip Ren
dc.contributor.authorMorgan, Jimen
dc.contributor.authorJessop, Robinen
dc.contributor.authorCass, Alfen
dc.date.accessioned2010-11-04T09:49:00Z-
dc.date.created1995en
dc.date.issued1997-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/6833-
dc.description.abstractCanola ('Brassica napus') has become an increasingly important crop in Australia, although it is poorly adapted to dry environments. Indian mustard ('B. juncea') is reputed to be better adapt ed to these environments and may be a suitable alternative crop in these areas. However, very little is known about the comparative performance of these crops or the basis for differences in adaptation. The work reported in this thesis set out to examine these questions and to provide at least a preliminary understanding of any observed differences. Five experiments were conducted comparing growth, yield, water use and plant water relations, chiefly under field conditions in northern NSW. At least three genotypes of each species were used in the field experiments and all were matched for phasic development and height in the main experiments. Mustard produced more above ground dry matter than canola (between 9 and 120%) with the biggest relative difference occurring at the greatest soil water deficit. Mustard yielded more than twice as much seed as canola under these conditions while there were no yield differences at low deficits. Components of yield differed between the two species with mustard having more pods per plant but fewer seeds per pod and a lower harvest index. Differences in these factors could not explain mustard's yield advantages; which was due to its greater dry matter production. The advantage in dry matter production was related to greater early vigour and an ability to maintain longer leaf area durations under water deficits. Differences in early vigour were associated with a greater rate of leaf expansion which arose from differences in leaf morphology, with mustard having smaller specific leaf weights. Water use efficiencies for seed and dry matter production were higher in mustard. Some evidence of higher transpiration efficiency in mustard was also found, both at a leaf and canopy level. Neither leaf stomatal density nor epidermal conductance could explain differences in transpirational efficiency, these differences were concluded to result from a greater photosynthetic rates per unit leaf area. Leaves of mustard were found to have higher turgor than those of canola particularly under water deficit conditions. Turgor maintenance in mustard was shown to be related to a greater capacity to accumulate solutes under these conditions. Differences in turgor were related to differences in dry matter production and may also be related to differences in water use efficiency. The results of these studies are consistent with osmoregulation being an important trait in mustard's greater adaptation to water deficits. It is recommended that work be continued on developing mustard as a crop in its own right for Australian conditions.en
dc.languageenen
dc.titleComparative adaptation of canola ('Brassica napus') and Indian mustard ('B. juncea') to soil water deficitsen
dc.typeThesis Doctoralen
dcterms.accessRightsUNE Greenen
local.contributor.firstnamePhilip Ren
local.contributor.firstnameJimen
local.contributor.firstnameRobinen
local.contributor.firstnameAlfen
dcterms.RightsStatementCopyright 1995 - Philip R Wrighten
dc.date.conferred1997en
local.thesis.degreelevelDoctoralen
local.thesis.degreenameDoctor of Philosophyen
local.contributor.grantorUniversity of New Englanden
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.emailrjessop@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryT2en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.identifier.epublicationsrecordvtls008566905en
local.access.fulltextYesen
local.contributor.lastnameWrighten
local.contributor.lastnameMorganen
local.contributor.lastnameJessopen
local.contributor.lastnameCassen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:rjessopen
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.rolesupervisoren
local.profile.rolesupervisoren
local.profile.rolesupervisoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:6994en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleComparative adaptation of canola ('Brassica napus') and Indian mustard ('B. juncea') to soil water deficitsen
local.output.categorydescriptionT2 Thesis - Doctorate by Researchen
local.thesis.borndigitalnoen
local.search.authorWright, Philip Ren
local.search.supervisorMorgan, Jimen
local.search.supervisorJessop, Robinen
local.search.supervisorCass, Alfen
local.open.fileurlhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/50b54f94-d447-437a-bb09-1164457f704een
local.open.fileurlhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/3d0569e1-c985-49b4-a233-635f60815549en
local.open.fileurlhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/54c33ec1-9b90-45fb-b983-108ae25f0fd1en
local.open.fileurlhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/dfd75794-fa27-418f-a1fc-b9afaf00dc55en
local.open.fileurlhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/b0ee3d98-c8e2-41b8-ae65-07e3d07b3056en
local.open.fileurlhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/ab23ac3b-80d1-4fb7-9382-00104785d9eden
local.uneassociationYesen
local.year.conferred1997en
local.fileurl.openhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/dfd75794-fa27-418f-a1fc-b9afaf00dc55en
local.fileurl.openhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/54c33ec1-9b90-45fb-b983-108ae25f0fd1en
local.fileurl.openhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/3d0569e1-c985-49b4-a233-635f60815549en
local.fileurl.openhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/ab23ac3b-80d1-4fb7-9382-00104785d9eden
local.fileurl.openhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/50b54f94-d447-437a-bb09-1164457f704een
local.fileurl.openhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/b0ee3d98-c8e2-41b8-ae65-07e3d07b3056en
Appears in Collections:School of Environmental and Rural Science
Thesis Doctoral
Files in This Item:
14 files
File Description SizeFormat 
open/SOURCE05.pdfThesis, part 21.96 MBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
open/SOURCE06.pdfThesis, part 31.94 MBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
open/SOURCE07.pdfThesis, part 41.52 MBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
open/SOURCE04.pdfThesis, part 11.69 MBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
open/SOURCE08.pdfThesis, part 51.34 MBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
open/SOURCE03.pdfAbstract588.15 kBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
1 2 3 Next
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

1,222
checked on Jun 11, 2023

Download(s)

702
checked on Jun 11, 2023
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.