Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/64358
Title: A Chinese-hating American in Colonial Australia? Misconstruing 'Monitor Hall'
Contributor(s): Ihde, Erin  (author)orcid 
Publication Date: 2018-12
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/64358
Abstract: 

The article examines the complex attitudes towards Chinese and Indian labourers, referred to as 'coolies', in Colonial Australia during the 1830s and 1840s. It argues that while some contemporary opinions, particularly those expressed by Edward Smith Hall, appear overtly discriminatory, a closer analysis reveals a more nuanced perspective focused on gender imbalance rather than outright racial prejudice. Hall's writings reflect concerns about the potential social consequences of importing male-only laborers, emphasising the importance of maintaining a balanced sex ratio to prevent moral decay and societal disruption. The article highlights the broader context of colonial anxieties regarding immigration, labour, and the legacy of convictism, suggesting that these factors shaped public discourse and policy decisions during this period. Overall, it calls for a reevaluation of historical interpretations of Hall's views and the motivations behind the anti-coolie sentiment.

Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Journal of Australian Colonial History, v.20, p. 123-138
Publisher: University of New England, School of Humanities
Place of Publication: Australia
ISSN: 1441-0370
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 430302 Australian history
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: 280113 Expanding knowledge in history, heritage and archaeology
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Publisher/associated links: https://blog.une.edu.au/australian-colonial-history/
Description: Editor: David Andrew Roberts
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences

Files in This Item:
1 files
File SizeFormat 
Show full item record
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons