Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/64315
Title: | Challenging misleading information about 'abortion reversal' |
Contributor(s): | Turner, Joseph Vernon (author) |
Publication Date: | 2024-06 |
DOI: | 10.1136/bmjsrh-2023-202189 |
Handle Link: | https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/64315 |
Abstract: | | The increasing literature on early pregnancy mifepristone antagonisation by progesterone is encouraging, as we seek to better serve women in this difficult situation. Nevertheless, there are ongoing examples of misleading information regarding scientific and clinical aspects of 'abortion reversal'. The recent review by Stifani and Lavelanet claimed that clinicians "should be cautious about providing high-dose progesterone off-label given the lack of evidence of benefit and the potential safety concerns".1 They cite the only randomised controlled trial (RCT) in the field, which also claimed that their small study provided important insights into the safety of mifepristone antag-onisation with progesterone in early pregnancy.2
Publication Type: | Journal Article |
Source of Publication: | BMJ Sexual and Reproductive Health, p. 1-2 |
Publisher: | BMJ Group |
Place of Publication: | United Kingdom |
ISSN: | 2515-2009 2515-1991 |
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: | 3215 Reproductive medicine |
HERDC Category Description: | C4 Letter of Note |
Appears in Collections: | Journal Article School of Rural Medicine
|
Files in This Item:
1 files
Show full item record
Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.