Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/63501
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZindove, Titus Jairusen
dc.contributor.authorBakare, Archibold Garikayien
dc.contributor.authorIji, Paul Adeen
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-17T04:08:14Z-
dc.date.available2024-10-17T04:08:14Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationAnimal Bioscience, 35(5), p. 778-788en
dc.identifier.issn2765-0235en
dc.identifier.issn2765-0189en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/63501-
dc.description.abstract<p>Objective: The objective of the study was to understand and document socio-economic characteristics, production parameters, challenges and management practices used by Fijian households which keep indigenous chickens.</p> <p>Methods: A survey involving 200 households was carried out in coastal and inland communities of Fiji's wet and semi-dry ecoregions. Data on the influence of ecoregion and location of households relative to the sea on management practices, challenges and productivity of indigenous chickens were analyzed using logistic regression and general linear model of SAS software.</p> <p>Results: Irrespective of location relative to the sea and ecoregion, households indicated that they kept indigenous chickens for food and income generation. The Welsummer was the most (p>0.05) preferred breed. Households in the semi-dry inland communities had the largest (p<0.05) flocks compared to those in semi-dry coastal communities and the wet region. Chickens in the semi-dry region performed better (p<0.05) than those in the wet region in terms of number of clutches per year and mature live weight. Predators and feed shortages were the biggest challenges faced by households in all areas. The mongoose was ranked as the most (p>0.05) common predator followed by domestic dogs. Most households in the wet ecoregion's coastal communities housed their chickens at night, whereas communities in semi-dry ecoregion housed their chickens most of the time (p<0.05). In all regions, no households sold their chickens to commercial markets (p>0.05). Households in semi-dry ecoregion were more likely (p>0.05) to sell their chickens at the local market place.</p> <p>Conclusion: The productivity of local chickens in Fiji is low because of feed shortage, predators such as the mongoose and lack of market linkages.</p>en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherAsian - Australasian Association of Animal Production Societiesen
dc.relation.ispartofAnimal Bioscienceen
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.titleIndigenous chicken production in Fiji Islands: knowledge, constraints and opportunitiesen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.5713/ab.21.0309en
dcterms.accessRightsUNE Greenen
dc.subject.keywordsProductivityen
dc.subject.keywordsConstraintsen
dc.subject.keywordsFlocken
dc.subject.keywordsIndigenous Chickensen
dc.subject.keywordsMarketsen
dc.subject.keywordsAgriculture, Dairy & Animal Scienceen
dc.subject.keywordsAgricultureen
local.contributor.firstnameTitus Jairusen
local.contributor.firstnameArchibold Garikayien
local.contributor.firstnamePaul Adeen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.emailpiji@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.publisher.placeKorea, Republic ofen
local.format.startpage778en
local.format.endpage788en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume35en
local.identifier.issue5en
local.title.subtitleknowledge, constraints and opportunitiesen
local.access.fulltextYesen
local.contributor.lastnameZindoveen
local.contributor.lastnameBakareen
local.contributor.lastnameIjien
dc.identifier.staffune-id:pijien
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:1959.11/63501en
local.date.onlineversion2022-
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleIndigenous chicken production in Fiji Islandsen
local.relation.fundingsourcenoteWe thank Fiji National University research office for funding the research (Funding number: GS005).en
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorZindove, Titus Jairusen
local.search.authorBakare, Archibold Garikayien
local.search.authorIji, Paul Adeen
local.open.fileurlhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/27e13efa-b034-4067-b52a-2260ed2edd45en
local.uneassociationYesen
local.atsiresearchNoen
local.sensitive.culturalNoen
local.year.available2022en
local.year.published2022en
local.fileurl.openhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/27e13efa-b034-4067-b52a-2260ed2edd45en
local.fileurl.openpublishedhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/27e13efa-b034-4067-b52a-2260ed2edd45en
local.subject.for20203003 Animal productionen
local.subject.seo2020tbden
local.profile.affiliationtypeExternal Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeExternal Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeUNE Affiliationen
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Environmental and Rural Science
Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
openpublished/IndigenousIji2022JournalArticle.pdfPublished version223.21 kBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
Show simple item record
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons