Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/63165
Title: Feed quality and feeding level effects on faecal composition in east African cattle farming systems
Contributor(s): Ali, A I M (author); Wassie, Shimels E (author); Joergensen, Rainer Georg (author); Korir, Daniel  (author)orcid ; Goopy, John P  (author); Butterbach-Bahl, Klaus (author); Merbold, Lutz (author); Dickhoefer, Uta (author); Schlecht, Eva (author)
Publication Date: 2021-02
Open Access: Yes
DOI: 10.3390/ani11020564
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/63165
Abstract: 

Effects of feeding levels below maintenance requirements of metabolizable energy (MER) and of feed supplementation on fecal nutrient and microbial C concentrations were evaluated. In experiment 1, Rhodes grass hay only was offered to Boran steers at 80%, 60%, and 40% of individual MER, while steers at 100% MER additionally received a concentrated mixture. This reduction in MER decreased N, increased fungal C but did not affect bacterial C concentrations in feces. In experiment 2, Holstein × Boran heifers were offered a poor-quality roughage diet without supplement, with sweet potato vine silage or with a urea-molasses block. These two supplements did not affect the fecal chemical composition or fungal C but increased bacterial C concentrations in feces. Across all data, the fungal C/bacterial C ratio was positively related to N and negatively to neutral detergent fiber concentrations in feces, indicating diet-induced shifts in the fecal microbial community.

Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Animals, 11(2), p. 1-12
Publisher: MDPI AG
Place of Publication: Switzerland
ISSN: 2076-2615
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 300307 Environmental studies in animal production
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Environmental and Rural Science

Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
openpublished/FeedQualityGoopy2021JournalArticle.pdfPublished Version265.08 kBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
Show full item record
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons