Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/62731
Title: COVID-19 related differences in the uptake and effects of internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy for symptoms of obsessive-compulsive disorder
Contributor(s): Li, Ian (author); Millard, Michael (author); Haskelberg, Hila (author); Hobbs, Megan  (author)orcid ; Luu, John (author); Mahoney, Alison (author)
Publication Date: 2022
Early Online Version: 2022
DOI: 10.1017/S1352465821000448
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/62731
Abstract: 

Background: The impacts of COVID-19 for people with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) may be considerable. Online cognitive behavioural therapy (iCBT) programmes provide scalable access to psychological interventions, although the effectiveness of iCBT for OCD during COVID-19 has not been evaluated.

Aim: This study investigated the uptake and effectiveness of iCBT for OCD (both self- and clinicianguided courses) during the first 8 months of the pandemic in Australia (March to October 2020) and compared outcomes with the previous year.

Method: 1,343 adults (824/1343 (61.4%) female, mean age 33.54 years, SD = 12.00) commenced iCBT for OCD (1061 during the pandemic and 282 in the year before) and completed measures of OCD (Dimensional Obsessive-Compulsive Scale) and depression (Patient Health Questionaire-9) symptom severity, psychological distress (Kessler-10), and disability (WHO Disability Assessment Schedule) preand post-treatment.

Results: During COVID-19, there was a 522% increase in monthly course registrations compared with the previous year, with peak uptake observed between April and June 2020 (a 1191% increase compared with April to June 2019). OCD and depression symptom severity were similar for the COVID and pre-COVID groups, although COVID-19 participants were more likely to enrol in self-guided courses (versus clinicianguided). In both pre- and during-COVID groups, the OCD iCBT course was associated with medium effect size reductions in OCD (g = 0.65–0.68) and depression symptom severity (g = 0.56–0.65), medium to large reductions in psychological distress (g = 0.77–0.83) and small reductions in disability (g = 0.35–.50).

Conclusion: Results demonstrate the considerable uptake of online psychological services for those experiencing symptoms of OCD during COVID-19 and highlight the scalability of effective digital mental health services.

Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 50(2), p. 219-236
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Place of Publication: United Kingdom
ISSN: 1469-1833
1352-4658
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 3202 Clinical sciences
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: tbd
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Rural Medicine

Files in This Item:
1 files
File SizeFormat 
Show full item record
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.