Title: | COVID-19 related differences in the uptake and effects of internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy for symptoms of obsessive-compulsive disorder |
Contributor(s): | Li, Ian (author); Millard, Michael (author); Haskelberg, Hila (author); Hobbs, Megan (author) ; Luu, John (author); Mahoney, Alison (author) |
Publication Date: | 2022 |
Early Online Version: | 2022 |
DOI: | 10.1017/S1352465821000448 |
Handle Link: | https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/62731 |
Abstract: | | Background: The impacts of COVID-19 for people with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) may be considerable. Online cognitive behavioural therapy (iCBT) programmes provide scalable access to psychological interventions, although the effectiveness of iCBT for OCD during COVID-19 has not been evaluated.
Aim: This study investigated the uptake and effectiveness of iCBT for OCD (both self- and clinicianguided courses) during the first 8 months of the pandemic in Australia (March to October 2020) and compared outcomes with the previous year.
Method: 1,343 adults (824/1343 (61.4%) female, mean age 33.54 years, SD = 12.00) commenced iCBT for OCD (1061 during the pandemic and 282 in the year before) and completed measures of OCD (Dimensional Obsessive-Compulsive Scale) and depression (Patient Health Questionaire-9) symptom severity, psychological distress (Kessler-10), and disability (WHO Disability Assessment Schedule) preand post-treatment.
Results: During COVID-19, there was a 522% increase in monthly course registrations compared with the previous year, with peak uptake observed between April and June 2020 (a 1191% increase compared with April to June 2019). OCD and depression symptom severity were similar for the COVID and pre-COVID groups, although COVID-19 participants were more likely to enrol in self-guided courses (versus clinicianguided). In both pre- and during-COVID groups, the OCD iCBT course was associated with medium effect size reductions in OCD (g = 0.65–0.68) and depression symptom severity (g = 0.56–0.65), medium to large reductions in psychological distress (g = 0.77–0.83) and small reductions in disability (g = 0.35–.50).
Conclusion: Results demonstrate the considerable uptake of online psychological services for those experiencing symptoms of OCD during COVID-19 and highlight the scalability of effective digital mental health services.
Publication Type: | Journal Article |
Source of Publication: | Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 50(2), p. 219-236 |
Publisher: | Cambridge University Press |
Place of Publication: | United Kingdom |
ISSN: | 1469-1833 1352-4658 |
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: | 3202 Clinical sciences |
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: | tbd |
Peer Reviewed: | Yes |
HERDC Category Description: | C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal |
Appears in Collections: | Journal Article School of Rural Medicine
|