Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/62626
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDowling, James Men
dc.contributor.authorBower, Deborah Sen
dc.contributor.authorBoscarino‐Gaetano, Remoen
dc.contributor.authorNordberg, Eric Jen
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-07T11:03:45Z-
dc.date.available2024-09-07T11:03:45Z-
dc.identifier.citationThe Journal of Wildlife Managementen
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/62626-
dc.description.abstract<p>Fences disturb the movements of terrestrial species, altering migration patterns, limiting access to vital resources, and reducing genetic diversity. With almost 40% of the Earth's land surface converted for agriculture, farm fencing to protect crops and corral livestock is expected to stretch into the millions of kilometers. As semi-terrestrial ectotherms, freshwater turtles are threatened by fences that limit access to resources and increase risks of desiccation, entanglement, and overheating, often resulting in death. To determine the effect of fences, we quantified the movement patterns for a population of eastern long-necked turtles (Chelodina longicollis) inhabiting an agricultural landscape near Armidale, New South Wales, Australia from November 2022 to September 2023. There was considerable variation in the distance traveled, home range size, and movement corridor selection between turtles that was not explained by the morphological factors of size, mass, or the loss of a limb (likely due to predation attempts). On average, 38%±4.70 (±SE) of turtle movements were terrestrial (overland) during their active season (spring and summer) during which they encountered fences frequently because of a complex matrix of paddocks. Fence design dictated the distance turtles traveled to locate a suitable passage point. The majority of fences allowed turtles to pass (turtle-friendly fences, 71.4% of total fence distance) as opposed to turtle-unfriendly fences (28.6% of total fence distance). Turtles were required to travel almost 4 times the distance to locate a suitable crossing point (a gap or fault in the fence) when they encountered an unfriendly fence (85.32 m±29.81) compared to a turtle-friendly fence (25.85 m±3.58). Our results highlight the need for land managers to avoid small-diameter exclusion fencing and fence designs containing chicken wire that extend to or below ground level. In settings where small-diameter wire fencing is required, we recommend the installation of turtle gates for small terrestrial fauna or elevating bottom wires at least 50 mm above ground level to facilitate fence permeability.</p>en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Incen
dc.relation.ispartofThe Journal of Wildlife Managementen
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.titleThe influence of fence design on the movement patterns of eastern long-necked turtlesen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/jwmg.22654en
dcterms.accessRightsUNE Greenen
local.contributor.firstnameJames Men
local.contributor.firstnameDeborah Sen
local.contributor.firstnameRemoen
local.contributor.firstnameEric Jen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.emaildbower3@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailenordber@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.publisher.placeUnited States of Americaen
local.identifier.runningnumbere22654en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.access.fulltextYesen
local.contributor.lastnameDowlingen
local.contributor.lastnameBoweren
local.contributor.lastnameBoscarino‐Gaetanoen
local.contributor.lastnameNordbergen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:dbower3en
dc.identifier.staffune-id:enordberen
local.profile.orcid0000-0003-0188-3290en
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-1333-622Xen
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:1959.11/62626en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleThe influence of fence design on the movement patterns of eastern long-necked turtlesen
local.relation.fundingsourcenoteRobine Enid Wilson Funden
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorDowling, James Men
local.search.authorBower, Deborah Sen
local.search.authorBoscarino‐Gaetano, Remoen
local.search.authorNordberg, Eric Jen
local.uneassociationYesen
dc.date.presented2024-
local.atsiresearchNoen
local.sensitive.culturalNoen
local.year.presented2024en
local.subject.for2020300202 Agricultural land managementen
local.subject.for2020310901 Animal behaviouren
local.codeupdate.date2025-01-02T09:48:46.992en
local.codeupdate.epersonenordber@une.edu.auen
local.codeupdate.finalisedtrueen
local.original.for20203109 Zoologyen
local.profile.affiliationtypeExternal Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeUNE Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeExternal Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeUNE Affiliationen
local.date.moved2024-09-13en
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Environmental and Rural Science
Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show simple item record
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons