Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/62511
Title: Linear and Nonlinear Quantitative EEG Analysis during Neutral Hypnosis following an Opened/Closed Eye Paradigm
Contributor(s): Rho, Gianluca (author); Callara, Alejandro Luis (author); Petri, Giovanni (author); Nardelli, Mimma (author); Scilingo, Enzo Pasquale (author); Greco, Alberto (author); De Pascalis, Vilfredo  (author)orcid 
Publication Date: 2021
Open Access: Yes
DOI: 10.3390/sym13081423
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/62511
Abstract: 

Hypnotic susceptibility is a major factor influencing the study of the neural correlates of hypnosis using EEG. In this context, while its effects on the response to hypnotic suggestions are undisputed, less attention has been paid to "neutral hypnosis" (i.e., the hypnotic condition in absence of suggestions). Furthermore, although an influence of opened and closed eye condition onto hypnotizability has been reported, a systematic investigation is still missing. Here, we analyzed EEG signals from 34 healthy subjects with low (LS), medium (MS), and (HS) hypnotic susceptibility using power spectral measures (i.e., TPSD, PSD) and Lempel-Ziv-Complexity (i.e., LZC, fLZC). Indeed, LZC was found to be more suitable than other complexity measures for EEG analysis, while it has been never used in the study of hypnosis. Accordingly, for each measure, we investigated within-group differences between rest and neutral hypnosis, and between opened-eye/closed-eye conditions under both rest and neutral hypnosis. Then, we evaluated between-group differences for each experimental condition. We observed that, while power estimates did not reveal notable differences between groups, LZC and fLZC were able to distinguish between HS, MS, and LS. In particular, we found a left frontal difference between HS and LS during closed-eye rest. Moreover, we observed a symmetric pattern distinguishing HS and LS during closed-eye hypnosis. Our results suggest that LZC is better capable of discriminating subjects with different hypnotic susceptibility, as compared to standard power analysis.

Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Symmetry, 13(8), p. 1-19
Publisher: MDPI AG
Place of Publication: Switzerland
ISSN: 2073-8994
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 5202 Biological psychology
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: tbd
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Psychology

Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
openpublished/LinearDePascalis2021JournalArticle.pdfPublished version1.5 MBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
Show full item record
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons