Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/62259
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFeyera, Tekaen
dc.contributor.authorShifaw, Anwar Yesufen
dc.contributor.authorRuhnke, Isabelleen
dc.contributor.authorSharpe, Brendanen
dc.contributor.authorElliott, Timothyen
dc.contributor.authorWalkden-Brown, Stephen Wen
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-20T10:30:49Z-
dc.date.available2024-08-20T10:30:49Z-
dc.date.issued2022-01-
dc.identifier.citationVeterinary Parasitology, v.301, p. 1-11en
dc.identifier.issn1873-2550en
dc.identifier.issn0304-4017en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/62259-
dc.description.abstract<p>With the continued growth of free-range egg production, the importance of the chicken roundworm <i>Ascaridia galli</i> is increasing. Investigations into this parasite would be facilitated by the availability of characterised strains and clear guidelines on optimal methods of multiplication and maintenance. Currently, there is lack of well-defined in vivo models for maintaining <i>A. galli</i> and the potential of using host immunosuppression to boost parasite development and worm egg output has not been investigated. To determine the most efficient way of propagating <i>A. galli</i> in young chickens an experiment with a 2 × 3 × 4 × 2 factorial design involving age of chicken at infection (day-old or 14 days old), immunosuppression (dexamethasone (DEX), cyclophosphamide (CY) or sham), infective egg dose (0, 100, 300 or 900 embryonated eggs/bird) and time of worm recovery after infection (8 or 10 weeks post-infection) was conducted. The experiment used a total of 384 layer cockerel chicks. Infection was delivered orally in 3 split doses over one week and immunosuppressants were administered by intramuscular injection concurrently with the infections. Body weight, excreta egg counts, intestinal worm count and worm establishment rate were assessed. The only sign of ascaridiosis noted was mild diarrhoea at the time of slaughter in some birds with a significant- positive association with worm count. Infection caused a significant dose dependent reduction in body weight in non-immunosuppressed birds but this effect was ameliorated by immunosuppression. Age at infection had no significant effect on the studied variables although both worm and egg counts were numerically higher in the day-old infected groups. Egg dose significantly influenced the prevalence of infection, worm establishment rate, worm egg production and mean worm count. The 300 and 900 egg doses resulted in significantly higher worm count and egg production than the 100 egg dose. A significant negative correlation was observed between egg dose and worm establishment rate indicating an inverse relationship. Immunosuppression with DEX, but not CY resulted in significantly higher mean worm burden than in control chickens with excreta egg counts also considerably higher in DEX treated birds. Our results suggest that trickle infection at day-old with infective doses of 300 eggs coupled with immunosuppression with DEX would provide the most efficient way to propagate <i>A. galli</i> worms in vivo, as using older birds or a higher egg dose did not provide any advantage.</p>en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherElsevier BVen
dc.relation.ispartofVeterinary Parasitologyen
dc.titleAscaridia galli challenge model for worm propagation in young chickens with or without immunosuppressionen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.vetpar.2021.109624en
local.contributor.firstnameTekaen
local.contributor.firstnameAnwar Yesufen
local.contributor.firstnameIsabelleen
local.contributor.firstnameBrendanen
local.contributor.firstnameTimothyen
local.contributor.firstnameStephen Wen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolAnimal Science, School of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolAnimal Science, School of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.emailtdewo@myune.edu.auen
local.profile.emailayesuf@myune.edu.auen
local.profile.emailiruhnke@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailbsharpe3@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailtellio22@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailswalkden@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.publisher.placeThe Netherlandsen
local.identifier.runningnumber109624en
local.format.startpage1en
local.format.endpage11en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume301en
local.contributor.lastnameFeyeraen
local.contributor.lastnameShifawen
local.contributor.lastnameRuhnkeen
local.contributor.lastnameSharpeen
local.contributor.lastnameElliotten
local.contributor.lastnameWalkden-Brownen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:tdewoen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:ayesufen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:iruhnkeen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:bsharpe3en
dc.identifier.staffune-id:tellio22en
dc.identifier.staffune-id:swalkdenen
local.profile.orcid0000-0001-5423-9306en
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-0638-5533en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:1959.11/62259en
local.date.onlineversion2021-11-26-
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleAscaridia galli challenge model for worm propagation in young chickens with or without immunosuppressionen
local.relation.fundingsourcenoteThis research was funded by Australian Eggs Ltd. Project1BS003.Teka Feyera was supported by a University of New England international postgraduate scholarship.en
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorFeyera, Tekaen
local.search.authorShifaw, Anwar Yesufen
local.search.authorRuhnke, Isabelleen
local.search.authorSharpe, Brendanen
local.search.authorElliott, Timothyen
local.search.authorWalkden-Brown, Stephen Wen
local.uneassociationYesen
local.atsiresearchNoen
local.sensitive.culturalNoen
local.year.available2021en
local.year.published2022en
local.fileurl.closedpublishedhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/e79c75d8-295b-412a-9442-6e9b324472f7en
local.subject.for20203009 Veterinary sciencesen
local.subject.seo2020TBDen
local.profile.affiliationtypeUNE Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeUNE Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeUNE Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeExternal Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeUNE Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeUNE Affiliationen
local.date.moved2024-08-22en
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Environmental and Rural Science
Files in This Item:
1 files
File SizeFormat 
Show simple item record
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.