Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/61670
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHan, Simon Jen
dc.contributor.authorKelly, Piersen
dc.contributor.authorWinters, Jamesen
dc.contributor.authorKemp, Charlesen
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-16T03:10:12Z-
dc.date.available2024-07-16T03:10:12Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationOpen Mind, v.6, p. 264-279en
dc.identifier.issn2470-2986en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/61670-
dc.description.abstract<p>Linguistic systems are hypothesised to be shaped by pressures towards communicative efficiency that drive processes of simplification. A longstanding illustration of this idea is the claim that Chinese characters have progressively simplified over time. Here we test this claim by analyzing a dataset with more than half a million images of Chinese characters spanning more than 3,000 years of recorded history. We find no consistent evidence of simplification through time, and contrary to popular belief we find that modern Chinese characters are higher in visual complexity than their earliest known counterparts. One plausible explanation for our findings is that simplicity trades off with distinctiveness, and that characters have become less simple because of pressures towards distinctiveness. Our findings are therefore compatible with functional accounts of language but highlight the diverse and sometimes counterintuitive ways in which linguistic systems are shaped by pressures for communicative efficiency.</p>en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherMIT Pressen
dc.relation.ispartofOpen Minden
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.titleSimplification Is Not Dominant in the Evolution of Chinese Charactersen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1162/opmi_a_00064en
local.contributor.firstnameSimon Jen
local.contributor.firstnamePiersen
local.contributor.firstnameJamesen
local.contributor.firstnameCharlesen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciencesen
local.profile.emailpkelly26@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.publisher.placeUnited States of Americaen
local.format.startpage264en
local.format.endpage279en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume6en
local.access.fulltextYesen
local.contributor.lastnameHanen
local.contributor.lastnameKellyen
local.contributor.lastnameWintersen
local.contributor.lastnameKempen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:pkelly26en
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-6467-2338en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:1959.11/61670en
local.date.onlineversion2022-
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleSimplification Is Not Dominant in the Evolution of Chinese Charactersen
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorHan, Simon Jen
local.search.authorKelly, Piersen
local.search.authorWinters, Jamesen
local.search.authorKemp, Charlesen
local.open.fileurlhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/d73b91f9-56c2-45f0-a864-4ff26328d60een
local.uneassociationYesen
local.atsiresearchNoen
local.sensitive.culturalNoen
local.year.available2022en
local.year.published2022en
local.fileurl.openhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/d73b91f9-56c2-45f0-a864-4ff26328d60een
local.fileurl.openpublishedhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/d73b91f9-56c2-45f0-a864-4ff26328d60een
local.subject.for2020440105 Linguistic anthropologyen
local.profile.affiliationtypeExternal Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeUNE Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeExternal Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeExternal Affiliationen
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences
Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
openpublished/SimplificationKelly2022JournalArticle.pdfPublished version2.21 MBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

4
checked on Dec 21, 2024

Page view(s)

192
checked on Dec 22, 2024

Download(s)

34
checked on Dec 22, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons