Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/61171
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDhileepan, Ken
dc.contributor.authorLockett, C Jen
dc.contributor.authorBalu, Aen
dc.contributor.authorMurugesan, Sen
dc.contributor.authorPerovic, D Jen
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, D B Jen
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-04T04:03:31Z-
dc.date.available2024-07-04T04:03:31Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Applied Entomology, 139(10), p. 800-812en
dc.identifier.issn1439-0418en
dc.identifier.issn0931-2048en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/61171-
dc.description.abstract<p>Prickly acacia (<i>Vachellia nilotica</i> subsp. <i>indica</i>), a native of the Indian sub-continent, is a serious weed of the grazing areas of northern Australia and is a target for classical biological control. Native range surveys in India identified a leaf webber, <i>Phycita</i> sp. (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) as a prospective biological control agent for prickly acacia. In this study, we report the life cycle and host-specificity test results <i>Phycita</i> sp. and highlight the contradictory results between the no-choice tests in India and Australia and the field host range in India. In no-choice tests in India and Australia, <i>Phycita</i> sp. completed development on two of 11 and 16 of 27 non-target test plant species, respectively. Although <i>Phycita</i> sp. fed and completed development on two non-target test plant species (<i>Vachellia planifrons</i> and <i>V. leucophloea</i>) in no-choice tests in India, there was no evidence of the insect on the two non-target test plant species in the field. Our contention is that oviposition behaviour could be the key mechanism in host selection of <i>Phycita</i> sp., resulting in its incidence only on prickly acacia in India. This is supported by paired oviposition choice tests involving three test plant species (<i>Acacia baileyana</i>, <i>A. mearnsii</i> and <i>A. deanei</i>) in quarantine in Australia, where eggs were laid only on prickly acacia. However, in paired oviposition choice trials, only few eggs were laid, making the results unreliable. Although oviposition choice tests suggest that prickly acacia is the most preferred and natural host, difficulties in conducting choice oviposition tests with fully grown trees under quarantine conditions in Australia and the logistic difficulties of conducting open-field tests with fully grown native Australian plants in India have led to rejection of Phycita sp. as a potential biological control agent for prickly acacia in Australia.</p>en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Verlag GmbHen
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Applied Entomologyen
dc.titleLife cycle and host range of Phycita sp. rejected for biological control of prickly acacia in Australiaen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jen.12220en
local.contributor.firstnameKen
local.contributor.firstnameC Jen
local.contributor.firstnameAen
local.contributor.firstnameSen
local.contributor.firstnameD Jen
local.contributor.firstnameD B Jen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental & Rural Scienceen
local.profile.emaildperovic@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.publisher.placeGermanyen
local.format.startpage800en
local.format.endpage812en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume139en
local.identifier.issue10en
local.contributor.lastnameDhileepanen
local.contributor.lastnameLocketten
local.contributor.lastnameBaluen
local.contributor.lastnameMurugesanen
local.contributor.lastnamePerovicen
local.contributor.lastnameTayloren
dc.identifier.staffune-id:dperovicen
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-7301-5591en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:1959.11/61171en
local.date.onlineversion2015-
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleLife cycle and host range of Phycita sp. rejected for biological control of prickly acacia in Australiaen
local.relation.fundingsourcenoteMeat & Livestock Australia and Rural Industries Research and Development Corporationen
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorDhileepan, Ken
local.search.authorLockett, C Jen
local.search.authorBalu, Aen
local.search.authorMurugesan, Sen
local.search.authorPerovic, D Jen
local.search.authorTaylor, D B Jen
local.uneassociationNoen
local.atsiresearchNoen
local.sensitive.culturalNoen
local.year.available2015en
local.year.published2015en
local.fileurl.closedpublishedhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/d02628da-5bbb-4012-8fa3-918c8c419504en
local.subject.for2020300804 Horticultural crop protection (incl. pests, diseases and weeds)en
local.subject.seo2020tbden
local.profile.affiliationtypeExternal Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeExternal Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeExternal Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeExternal Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeExternal Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeExternal Affiliationen
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Environmental and Rural Science
Files in This Item:
1 files
File SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

4
checked on Dec 21, 2024

Page view(s)

114
checked on Jul 14, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.