Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/60375
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPopat, Meizalen
dc.contributor.authorGriffith, Garryen
dc.contributor.authorMounter, Stuarten
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-01T09:33:58Z-
dc.date.available2024-06-01T09:33:58Z-
dc.date.issued2017-09-13-
dc.identifier.citationAustralasian Agribusiness Review, v.25, p. 1-20en
dc.identifier.issn1833-5675en
dc.identifier.issn1442-6951en
dc.identifier.issn1320-0348en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/60375-
dc.description.abstract<p>It is now 25 years since pig meat imports were first allowed into Australia. Pig producers have argued that import liberalization has caused the decline in the domestic production of pig meat and in the profitability of pig production. In its most recent Inquiry report in 2008, the Productivity Commission (PC) concluded that the main reason for the declining profitability of pig farmers in Australia was the higher costs of feed in the domestic market. Movements of the Australian dollar were also found to favour increased imports of pig meat. Based on analyses conducted with data up to 2007, the PC was unable to justify the need for Australia to activate the safeguard measures prescribed under the World Trade Organization (WTO) rules in order to temporarily protect the local pig industry. Since then the volume of pig meat imports into Australia has continued to rise so that by 2014 imported pig meat made up nearly 70 percent of the total pig meat processed domestically and half of total consumption. The question addressed in this analysis is whether the current market scenario of substantial and continuing increases in pig meat imports in Australia could now justify the need for the WTO’s safeguard measures. The specific objective is to assess whether the PC’s earlier results still hold using exactly the same methods but with an updated dataset. Application of the first of the estimation techniques used by the PC suggests that domestic production has been affecting the sale yard price rather than import volumes or prices, while the second technique used by the PC and its respective post-estimation tests did not suggest a strong causal effect between import volume or unit values and domestic production or sale yard price. Thus, based on the PC’s models, it is unlikely that a new case could be made for the application of the WTO safeguard measures to the Australian pig meat industry. However, there are a number of statistical problems with the PC models that were simply updated for the current analysis. In a companion paper, the PC models are re-specified and re-estimated to overcome these statistical problems. </p>en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherUniversity of Melbourneen
dc.relation.ispartofAustralasian Agribusiness Reviewen
dc.titleThe economic impact of imports on the Australian pig industry: is it time for the WTO’s safeguard measures? 1. Replicating and updating the 2008 Productivity Commission analysesen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
local.contributor.firstnameMeizalen
local.contributor.firstnameGarryen
local.contributor.firstnameStuarten
local.profile.schoolUNE Business Schoolen
local.profile.schoolUNE Business Schoolen
local.profile.schoolUNE Business Schoolen
local.profile.emailmpopat2@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailggriffit@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailsmounte2@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.publisher.placeAustraliaen
local.identifier.runningnumber1en
local.format.startpage1en
local.format.endpage20en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume25en
local.title.subtitleis it time for the WTO’s safeguard measures? 1. Replicating and updating the 2008 Productivity Commission analysesen
local.contributor.lastnamePopaten
local.contributor.lastnameGriffithen
local.contributor.lastnameMounteren
dc.identifier.staffune-id:mpopat2en
dc.identifier.staffune-id:ggriffiten
dc.identifier.staffune-id:smounte2en
local.profile.orcid0000-0003-2669-6870en
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-5276-6222en
local.profile.orcid0000-0001-6637-3756en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:1959.11/60375en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleThe economic impact of imports on the Australian pig industryen
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.relation.urlhttps://blog.une.edu.au/australasian-agribusiness-review/category/2017-volume-25/en
local.search.authorPopat, Meizalen
local.search.authorGriffith, Garryen
local.search.authorMounter, Stuarten
local.uneassociationYesen
local.atsiresearchNoen
local.sensitive.culturalNoen
local.year.published2017en
local.fileurl.closedpublishedhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/6b591545-94ff-4f38-8ac0-fbaa0ea12e87en
local.subject.for2020380101 Agricultural economicsen
local.codeupdate.date2024-08-06T15:36:04.410en
local.codeupdate.epersonsmounte2@une.edu.auen
local.codeupdate.finalisedtrueen
local.original.for20203801 Applied economicsen
local.profile.affiliationtypeExternal Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeUNE Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeUNE Affiliationen
local.date.moved2024-06-18en
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
UNE Business School
Files in This Item:
1 files
File SizeFormat 
Show simple item record
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.